Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #52,479 of 84,120 nationally

Spring Valley Eviction Risk: Lower , Riverdale

Tract 13063040534 · Clayton County, GA · pop 2,976 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Census tract 13063040534 covers part of the Spring Valley area of Riverdale, GA, and scores 3.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,976. 39% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 15% Owners 68%
Tract context
Occupied units1,112
Renter share32.3%
SVI overall0.70
Poverty rate11.3%
Median income$48,667

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Spring Valley
Moderate
Within parent city
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 12 tracts In Riverdale
Moderate
Within county
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#43 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
Low
Within state
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#1,490 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Riverdale and the region

Centroid at 33.5603, -84.3962 · click any tract to drill in

Why Spring Valley scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Riverdale
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
11.3% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,404 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Riverdale
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Riverdale
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Riverdale
6.8

How Spring Valley compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Spring Valley risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.8This tracttract 0405344.0Riverdaleparent city4.4Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 70

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,396Total filings 2020-21
  • 18.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Spring Valley

The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.9/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.9/10.

Set annual rent against average income of $48,667 and the ratio lands at 35%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Running hot, local political climate reads 8.7/10. Food insecurity runs 30.4% against 17.8% nationally.

Housing insecurity runs 26.6% against 14.2% nationally. It sits 0.6 points below the Clayton County average of 4.4.

That is riskier than roughly 38% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 54% of renters.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040534

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040534?

Census tract 13063040534 in the Spring Valley neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040534?

Median gross rent is $1,404/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040534?

11.3% of residents in tract 13063040534 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,976.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040534?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 70th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 88th, minority 93th, housing 9th.
Q5

Is tract 13063040534 considered part of Spring Valley?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040534 fall within Spring Valley (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 13063040534 struggle to pay rent?

About 26.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13063040534 compare to Riverdale overall?

Tract 13063040534 scores 3.8/10, right in line with the parent city of Riverdale at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Riverdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Riverdale

Top eight tracts in Riverdale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related