Neighborhood · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally
Oakengate Eviction Risk: Lower , Clarkston
Tract 13089022010 ·
DeKalb County, GA · pop 2,284 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Census tract 13089022010 runs through the Oakengate area of Clarkston. With 2,284 residents, it scores 6.9/10 for landlords. That is riskier than about 93% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 57% of renter households, a severe level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,405 a month against an average household income of $88,000 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 33% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19%Stable renters 14%Owners 67%
Tract context
Occupied units626
Renter share33.1%
SVI overall0.74
Poverty rate13.3%
Median income$88,000
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#4 of 7 tracts In Oakengate
Moderate
Within parent city
0th percentile
#6 of 6 tracts In Clarkston
Very Low
Within county
58th percentile
#85 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Elevated
Within state
52th percentile
#1,353 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Clarkston and the region
Centroid at 33.8132, -84.2298 · click any tract to drill in
Why Oakengate scores 3.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Clarkston
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
13.3% poverty · this tract
3.3
Supply constraint
$1,405 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Clarkston
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Clarkston
9.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Clarkston
8.5
How Oakengate compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 74
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
78%Socioeconomic
49%Household composition
84%Racial/ethnic minority
62%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
395Total filings over 8 yrs
8.24%Avg annual filing rate
15.9%Peak (2004)
6Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2004 to 2016
Filings dropped 96% over the past 8 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
44Total filings 2020-21
0.6Avg monthly (observed)
0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
17.5%Housing insecurity
11.1%Utility-shutoff threat
23.4%Food insecurity
18.3%SNAP enrollment
11.7%Transit barriers
15.1%No health insurance
16.7%Frequent mental distress
27.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Oakengate
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Clarkston, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 395 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 8.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 15.9% of renter households in 2004.
The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 74th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 13089022010
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089022010?
Census tract 13089022010 in the Oakengate neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13089022010?
Median gross rent is $1,405/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13089022010?
13.3% of residents in tract 13089022010 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,284.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13089022010?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 74th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 78th, household 49th, minority 84th, housing 62th.
Q5
Is tract 13089022010 considered part of Oakengate?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089022010 fall within Oakengate (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089022010?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 395 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089022010 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.24% of renter households, peaking at 15.9% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 13089022010 struggle to pay rent?
About 17.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 13089022010 compare to Clarkston overall?
Tract 13089022010 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of Clarkston at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Clarkston; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Clarkston
Top eight tracts in Clarkston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.