Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #71,178 of 84,120 nationally
Gledstone Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Fairburn
Tract 13121010540 · Fulton County, GA · pop 5,942 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Census tract 13121010540 belongs to the Gledstone Hills neighborhood of Fairburn, Georgia. It is home to 5,942 residents and scores 6.1/10, an elevated reading for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 78% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
48% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 40% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,889 a month against an average household income of $110,616 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 66% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
2.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32%
Stable renters 34%
Owners 34%
Tract context
Occupied units1,738
Renter share66.1%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate0.5%
Median income$110,616
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
33
th percentile
Low
Within state
18
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fairburn and the region
Centroid at 33.5420, -84.5593 · click any tract to drill in
Why Gledstone Hills scores 2.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Fairburn
5.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
0.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,889 rent vs county FMR
5.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fairburn
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fairburn
8.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fairburn
6.8
How Gledstone Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 47
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 61%Socioeconomic
- 46%Household composition
- 95%Racial/ethnic minority
- 13%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 1,720Total filings 2020-21
- 22.6Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 25.8%Housing insecurity
- 16.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 29.4%Food insecurity
- 25.2%SNAP enrollment
- 15.4%Transit barriers
- 16.0%No health insurance
- 19.7%Frequent mental distress
- 30.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Gledstone Hills
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fairburn, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Fulton County average of 5.7 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 25.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 16.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 47th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 13121010540
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13121010540?
Census tract 13121010540 in the Gledstone Hills neighborhood scores 2.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13121010540?
Median gross rent is $1,889/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13121010540?
0.5% of residents in tract 13121010540 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,942.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13121010540?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 46th, minority 95th, housing 13th.
Q5
Is tract 13121010540 considered part of Gledstone Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13121010540 fall within Gledstone Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 13121010540 struggle to pay rent?
About 25.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 13121010540 compare to Fairburn overall?
Tract 13121010540 scores 2.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Fairburn at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fairburn; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fairburn
Top eight tracts in Fairburn ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related