Neighborhood · Ranked #60,063 of 84,120 nationally
Twin Lakes Eviction Risk: Lower , Hoschton
Tract 13157010106 ·
Jackson County, GA · pop 3,931 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
For landlords sizing up the Twin Lakes area of Hoschton, census tract 13157010106 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 4.9/10. That is riskier than roughly 36% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 28% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 3% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,214 a month against an average household income of $92,225 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. Renters make up 21% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%Stable renters 15%Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,678
Renter share21.3%
SVI overall0.31
Poverty rate14.3%
Median income$92,225
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Twin Lakes
Moderate
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Hoschton
Moderate
Within county
69th percentile
#6 of 17 tracts In Jackson County
Elevated
Within state
34th percentile
#1,830 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Hoschton and the region
Centroid at 34.0948, -83.7501 · click any tract to drill in
Why Twin Lakes scores 2.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Hoschton
3.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.1
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
14.3% poverty · this tract
3.6
Supply constraint
$1,214 rent vs county FMR
6.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hoschton
3.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hoschton
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hoschton
5.0
How Twin Lakes compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 31
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
36%Socioeconomic
51%Household composition
30%Racial/ethnic minority
25%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
12.0%Housing insecurity
7.4%Utility-shutoff threat
14.8%Food insecurity
11.2%SNAP enrollment
8.0%Transit barriers
12.7%No health insurance
17.3%Frequent mental distress
29.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Twin Lakes
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 6.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hoschton, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Jackson County average of 4.8 and below the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 31st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 12.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 13157010106
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13157010106?
Census tract 13157010106 in the Twin Lakes neighborhood scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13157010106?
Median gross rent is $1,214/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13157010106?
14.3% of residents in tract 13157010106 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,931.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13157010106?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 31th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 36th, household 51th, minority 30th, housing 25th.
Q5
Is tract 13157010106 considered part of Twin Lakes?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13157010106 fall within Twin Lakes (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 13157010106 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 13157010106 compare to Hoschton overall?
Tract 13157010106 scores 2.9/10, higher than the parent city of Hoschton at 2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hoschton; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.