Swan Valley Eviction Risk: Lower

On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.1/10. Severe burden reaches 23%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Well under the midpoint, housing-court posture reads 1.3/10.

The voucher gap is 24.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. roughly one in four of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, below the Bonneville County average of 32.8%. SNAP participation runs 5.1% against 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 7.8% against 17.8% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Only 11% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 18% of average household income of $109,545, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.