Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #59,654 of 84,120 nationally

Nampa Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 16027021103 · Canyon County, ID · pop 3,130 · 82% of tract blocks fall in Nampa

Census tract 16027021103 covers part of Nampa, ID, and scores 3.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,130. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 12% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,200
Renter share22.3%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate8.9%
Median income$61,812

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 29 tracts In Nampa
Elevated
Within county
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#24 of 54 tracts In Canyon County
Elevated
Within state
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#217 of 456 tracts In Idaho
Moderate
National
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#59,654 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Nampa and the region

Centroid at 43.6102, -116.5401 · click any tract to drill in

Why Nampa scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Nampa
3.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.0
State political climate
Idaho legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
8.9% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,324 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Nampa
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Nampa
2.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Nampa
2.0

How Nampa compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Nampa risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.4This tracttract 0211033.2Nampaparent city3.5Countyavg tract in county3.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 51

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Nampa

Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Well under the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 2/10. 12% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

That is riskier than roughly 29% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 22% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 5.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 45% of renters. It tracks the Canyon County average of 3.5 closely.

Average gross rent is $1,324, close to the Nampa average. Annual rent works out to 26% of average household income of $61,812.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 16027021103

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 16027021103?

Census tract 16027021103 in Nampa scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 16027021103?

Median gross rent is $1,324/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 16027021103?

8.9% of residents in tract 16027021103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,130.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 16027021103?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 87th, minority 58th, housing 28th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 16027021103 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 16027021103 compare to Nampa overall?

Tract 16027021103 scores 3.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Nampa at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Nampa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Nampa

Top eight tracts in Nampa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related