Skip to content
Parma, Idaho eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,928 residents

Parma, ID Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Canyon County · Population 1,928

In 2026
Risk score
2
VERY LOW

62th percentile, Idaho.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.9 Average2.3 Now2
3.7 1.9 1976 · score 2.0 1977 · score 2.0 1978 · score 2.0 1979 · score 2.0 1980 · score 2.1 1981 · score 2.1 1982 · score 2.1 1983 · score 2.0 1984 · score 1.9 1985 · score 2.0 1986 · score 2.0 1987 · score 2.0 1988 · score 2.1 1989 · score 2.0 1990 · score 2.1 1991 · score 2.2 1992 · score 2.6 1993 · score 2.6 1994 · score 2.6 1995 · score 2.6 1996 · score 2.6 1997 · score 2.5 1998 · score 2.5 1999 · score 2.5 2000 · score 2.4 2001 · score 2.4 2002 · score 2.4 2003 · score 2.3 2004 · score 2.2 2005 · score 2.1 2006 · score 2.0 2007 · score 1.9 2008 · score 2.5 2009 · score 2.7 2010 · score 2.7 2011 · score 2.7 2012 · score 2.6 2013 · score 2.5 2014 · score 2.3 2015 · score 2.3 2016 · score 2.3 2017 · score 2.3 2018 · score 2.3 2019 · score 2.3 2020 · score 3.4 2021 · score 3.7 2022 · score 2.8 2023 · score 2.5 2024 · score 2.1 2025 · score 2.1 2026 · score 2.0

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.7 Regional 3.7 State 1.6 Economic 6.6 Supply 6.4 Rent Control 5.7 Eviction 1.5 Tenant 7.2 Housing 6.8 2 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +46.6% (2024)
    3.7
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.7
  3. State political climate
    Idaho legislature & governorship
    1.6
  4. Economic stress
    20.2% poverty · 3.4% unemp.
    6.6
  5. Supply constraint
    $980 average · 34.4% renters
    6.4
  6. Rent Control risk
    24.8% of income on rent
    5.7
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    24 days filing → judgment
    1.5
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    34.4% renters
    7.2
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.8
Geographic context

Risk heat across Parma and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Parma compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Canyon County
Very Low
#7 of 8 cities
Rank in county, 14th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 8 cities in Canyon County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Idaho
Moderate
#110 of 236 cities
Rank in state, 54th percentileLowHigh
#110 of 236 cities in Idaho for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Parma risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Parma: 2.02.0ParmaThis cityCounty: 2.22.2Countyavg in countyState: 2.12.1Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.0 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 24d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $980/mo. A contested eviction takes 24 days and costs $880–$2,500 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 34.4%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,928 residents, 34.4% rent. 25% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 20.2% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.7
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.7 and 3.7 (GOP margin +46.6% (2024)). State climate at 1.6, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.6
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.5, housing court bias 6.8, rent-control risk 5.7. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.5 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.6
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.6. Supply constraint: 6.4. The numbers behind those: 20.2% poverty, 3.4% unemployment, 25% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Parma sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 20d 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Boise City, ID · 23d · ~$1.6k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.1 Boise City Meridian, ID · 23d · ~$1.8k all-in ($77/day) · score 2 Meridian Nampa, ID · 22d · ~$1.6k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.1 Nampa Caldwell, ID · 23d · ~$1.6k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.3 Caldwell Idaho Falls, ID · 23d · ~$1.6k all-in ($69/day) · score 1.9 Idaho Falls Pocatello, ID · 23d · ~$1.8k all-in ($78/day) · score 2.4 Pocatello Coeur d'Alene, ID · 25d · ~$1.5k all-in ($60/day) · score 2.1 Coeur d'Alene Twin Falls, ID · 23d · ~$1.5k all-in ($66/day) · score 2 Twin Falls Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Parma
Parma · 24d · ~$1.7k all-in ($70/day) · score 2 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Parma, ID

Landlording in Parma, Idaho, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Parma is a city of 1,928 residents where 34.4% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 24.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $980/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Parma eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.5/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Parma closes 24 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Parma's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6.8/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Parma runs $880 to $2,500 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 24 days of typical timeline and $980/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7.2/10 in Parma, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5.7/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Idaho, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Parma: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Idaho's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,500 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Parma

Trap · 34.4%
34.4% renter share against 1,928 residents produces roughly 663 rental occupants in Parma. Canyon County voted R 39.7% in 2020. Eviction filings tend to cluster in the multifamily rental corridor.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the best way to handle a tenant who's always late with rent but eventually pays?

You have a choice: either strictly enforce your lease with late fees and 3-day notices every time, or offer a slight grace period in exchange for something like a longer lease term. Don't let it slide consistently without consequences, or they'll never take your deadlines seriously. Be consistent.
Q2

Can I raise the rent whenever I want in Parma?

Idaho has no statewide rent control, and Parma doesn't have local ordinances either. This means you can raise the rent, but you must give proper notice. For a month-to-month lease, typically a 30-day written notice is required before the new rent takes effect. Check your lease for specific notice periods. For more info, see Idaho rent control rules.
Q3

What if my tenant abandons the property?

If it's clear the tenant has moved out and left personal belongings, you need to follow specific procedures for abandoned property. You can't just toss their stuff. Idaho law usually requires you to store the property and provide notice to the tenant before disposing of it. Consult an attorney or review state statutes to ensure you comply.
Q4

Do I need to allow pets if a tenant has an emotional support animal?

Yes, under federal fair housing laws, emotional support animals (ESAs) are generally not considered pets and must be accommodated, even if you have a "no pets" policy. You can ask for documentation from a healthcare professional, but you cannot charge a pet deposit or pet rent for an ESA. This is a common area for landlord mistakes, so be careful. For broader context on tenant protections, look at Idaho tenant protections.
Q5

Can I change the locks if the tenant is behind on rent?

Absolutely not. This is an illegal "self-help" eviction and can get you into serious legal trouble. You must go through the proper court eviction process to legally remove a tenant. Always follow the law, even if it feels slower.
Q6

What's the deal with my property being in Canyon County? Are there separate rules?

While the core eviction process is set by Idaho state law, local courts in Canyon County will handle the actual filings and hearings. There aren't separate "Canyon County eviction rules" distinct from state law, but court procedures and specific judge preferences can vary slightly. It's good to be aware of your local court. Our Canyon County eviction guide offers more specific local insights.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2/10 places Parma in the 62nd percentile of Idaho cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.