Skip to content
Horseshoe Bend, Idaho eviction risk overview
City brief · 758 residents

Horseshoe Bend, ID Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Gem County · Population 758

In 2026
Risk score
1.7
VERY LOW

23th percentile, Idaho.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.7 Average2.2 Now1.7
3.5 1.7 1976 · score 1.9 1977 · score 1.9 1978 · score 1.9 1979 · score 1.9 1980 · score 2.0 1981 · score 1.9 1982 · score 2.0 1983 · score 1.9 1984 · score 1.8 1985 · score 1.9 1986 · score 1.9 1987 · score 1.9 1988 · score 2.0 1989 · score 1.9 1990 · score 2.0 1991 · score 2.1 1992 · score 2.5 1993 · score 2.5 1994 · score 2.5 1995 · score 2.5 1996 · score 2.5 1997 · score 2.4 1998 · score 2.4 1999 · score 2.4 2000 · score 2.3 2001 · score 2.3 2002 · score 2.3 2003 · score 2.2 2004 · score 2.1 2005 · score 2.0 2006 · score 1.9 2007 · score 1.9 2008 · score 2.4 2009 · score 2.7 2010 · score 2.7 2011 · score 2.7 2012 · score 2.5 2013 · score 2.4 2014 · score 2.3 2015 · score 2.3 2016 · score 2.2 2017 · score 2.2 2018 · score 2.1 2019 · score 2.2 2020 · score 3.3 2021 · score 3.5 2022 · score 2.6 2023 · score 2.3 2024 · score 1.8 2025 · score 1.8 2026 · score 1.7

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.7 Regional 2.7 State 1.6 Economic 5.3 Supply 6.1 Rent Control 2.7 Eviction 1.3 Tenant 7.5 Housing 5.0 1.7 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +66.0% (2024)
    2.7
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.7
  3. State political climate
    Idaho legislature & governorship
    1.6
  4. Economic stress
    17.1% poverty · 1.1% unemp.
    5.3
  5. Supply constraint
    $836 average · 27.2% renters
    6.1
  6. Rent Control risk
    22.9% of income on rent
    2.7
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    26 days filing → judgment
    1.3
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    27.2% renters
    7.5
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.0
Geographic context

Risk heat across Horseshoe Bend and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Horseshoe Bend compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Gem County
Low
#3 of 4 cities
Rank in county, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 cities in Gem County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Idaho
Very Low
#194 of 236 cities
Rank in state, 18th percentileLowHigh
#194 of 236 cities in Idaho for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Horseshoe Bend risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Horseshoe Bend: 1.71.7Horseshoe BendThis cityCounty: 1.91.9Countyavg in countyState: 2.12.1Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 1.7
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 1.7/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-0.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 26d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $836/mo. A contested eviction takes 26 days and costs $993–$2,573 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 27.2%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 758 residents, 27.2% rent. 23% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 17.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.7
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.7 and 2.7 (GOP margin +66.0% (2024)). State climate at 1.6, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.6
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.3, housing court bias 5, rent-control risk 2.7. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.7 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.3
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.3. Supply constraint: 6.1. The numbers behind those: 17.1% poverty, 1.1% unemployment, 23% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Horseshoe Bend sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 20d 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Boise City, ID · 23d · ~$1.6k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.1 Boise City Meridian, ID · 23d · ~$1.8k all-in ($77/day) · score 2 Meridian Nampa, ID · 22d · ~$1.6k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.1 Nampa Caldwell, ID · 23d · ~$1.6k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.3 Caldwell Idaho Falls, ID · 23d · ~$1.6k all-in ($69/day) · score 1.9 Idaho Falls Pocatello, ID · 23d · ~$1.8k all-in ($78/day) · score 2.4 Pocatello Coeur d'Alene, ID · 25d · ~$1.5k all-in ($60/day) · score 2.1 Coeur d'Alene Twin Falls, ID · 23d · ~$1.5k all-in ($66/day) · score 2 Twin Falls Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Horseshoe Bend
Horseshoe Bend · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 1.7 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Horseshoe Bend, ID

Landlording in Horseshoe Bend, Idaho, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 1.7/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Horseshoe Bend is a city of 758 residents where 27.2% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 22.9% of income on rent. At an average rent of $836/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Horseshoe Bend eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.3/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Horseshoe Bend closes 26 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Horseshoe Bend's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Horseshoe Bend runs $993 to $2,573 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 26 days of typical timeline and $836/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7.5/10 in Horseshoe Bend, and the city has limited rent control exposure (2.7/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Idaho, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Horseshoe Bend: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Idaho's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,573 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Horseshoe Bend

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Compare Horseshoe Bend to neighboring cities in Gem County via the grid below. The 3.4/10 score is computed from nine sub-factors plus a state-law multiplier under Idaho Code 6-303. Gem County 2020 presidential margin: R+61.7. Cross-reference the state overview link in the guides section for Idaho statutory detail.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What is the biggest risk for landlords in Horseshoe Bend?

While the overall eviction risk is low (3.4/10), the biggest sub-score risk is tenant organizing strength at 7.5/10. This means that while individual evictions are straightforward, there's a higher potential for collective tenant action or advocacy groups to emerge, which could influence future regulations. Stay informed, but don't overreact.

Q2

Can I evict a tenant in Horseshoe Bend without a specific reason?

Yes, Idaho does not have a statewide just-cause eviction requirement. If your lease is month-to-month or ending, you can typically terminate the tenancy with proper notice (usually 30 days) without needing to state a specific "reason," provided you are not discriminating or retaliating.

Q3

How much notice do I need to give for non-payment of rent?

For non-payment of rent in Horseshoe Bend, you must provide a 3-day pay-or-quit notice. The tenant has three full days to pay the overdue rent or vacate the property before you can file an eviction lawsuit.

Q4

Is there rent control in Horseshoe Bend?

No, there is no rent control in Horseshoe Bend or anywhere else in Idaho. The state has preempted local governments from enacting rent control measures. This is reflected in the low rent-control-risk sub-score of 2.7/10.

Q5

What should I do if my tenant just disappears?

If a tenant abandons the property, you generally need to follow specific procedures to legally regain possession and dispose of any left-behind property. Typically, you must send a notice of abandonment and wait a set period (often 5-7 days) before taking possession. Consult an attorney to ensure you follow the correct legal steps to avoid issues.

Q6

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Horseshoe Bend?

While you can represent yourself in court, it's highly recommended to use an attorney for an eviction. They ensure all notices are correct, filings are timely, and procedures are followed precisely. This minimizes delays and increases your chances of a swift, successful outcome, saving you money in the long run. See our Idaho eviction risk overview for more statewide context.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 1.7/10 places Horseshoe Bend in the 23rd percentile of Idaho cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.