Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #10,727 of 84,120 nationally
Arizona Eviction Risk: Elevated , Burnham
Tract 17031825700 · Cook County, IL · pop 4,028 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
Tract 17031825700 sits in the Arizona eviction laws area of Burnham, IL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 7.4/10. It is home to 4,028 residents. Pulling hardest the other way is supply constraint at 1.7/10.
Risk score
7.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20%
Stable renters 20%
Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units1,476
Renter share40.0%
SVI overall0.91
Poverty rate13.8%
Median income$55,708
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
68
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
86
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Burnham and the region
Centroid at 41.6395, -87.5450 · click any tract to drill in
Why Arizona scores 7.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Burnham
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
13.8% poverty · this tract
3.5
Supply constraint
$1,183 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Burnham
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Burnham
8.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Burnham
7.2
How Arizona compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 91
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 91%Socioeconomic
- 64%Household composition
- 91%Racial/ethnic minority
- 86%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 12%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 434Total filings over 15 yrs
- 6.30%Avg annual filing rate
- 9.9%Peak (2014)
- 37Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 37% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Arizona. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 26.7%Housing insecurity
- 16.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 32.8%Food insecurity
- 31.4%SNAP enrollment
- 14.9%Transit barriers
- 14.6%No health insurance
- 17.5%Frequent mental distress
- 33.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Arizona
SNAP participation runs 31.4% against 15.2% nationally. Severe burden reaches 18%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.1/10.
Housing insecurity runs 26.7% against 14.2% nationally. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.9/10. Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.3 points.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 434 filings here across 15 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2014 at 9.9% of renter households.
This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 6.3% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #10,727 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031825700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031825700?
Census tract 17031825700 in the Arizona neighborhood scores 7.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031825700?
Median gross rent is $1,183/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031825700?
13.8% of residents in tract 17031825700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,028.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031825700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 91th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 64th, minority 91th, housing 86th.
Q5
Is tract 17031825700 considered part of Arizona?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031825700 fall within Arizona (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031825700?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 434 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031825700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.30% of renter households, peaking at 9.9% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031825700 struggle to pay rent?
About 26.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031825700 compare to Burnham overall?
Tract 17031825700 scores 7.4/10, higher than the parent city of Burnham at 6.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Burnham; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031825700 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 12% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related