Tract 17031461000 ·
Cook County, IL · pop 1,346 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
17031461000 is a census tract in the Vet's Park area of Chicago, IL. It scores 8.1/10 for landlords. Population here is 1,346. What pushes it up most is economic stress at 10/10.
Risk score
8.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 43%Stable renters 48%Owners 9%
Tract context
Occupied units741
Renter share90.6%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate40.9%
Median income$14,311
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100th percentile
#1 of 2 tracts In Vet's Park
Very High
Within parent city
68th percentile
#258 of 792 tracts In Chicago
Elevated
Within county
90th percentile
#136 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
High
Within state
100th percentile
#5 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.7274, -87.5465 · click any tract to drill in
Why Vet's Park scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
40.9% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$409 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5
How Vet's Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 96
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
93%Socioeconomic
98%Household composition
94%Racial/ethnic minority
75%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
72%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
298Total filings over 15 yrs
3.03%Avg annual filing rate
5.2%Peak (2006)
29Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year2001 to 2015
Filings climbed 16% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Vet's Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
30.3%Housing insecurity
20.9%Utility-shutoff threat
47.8%Food insecurity
51.2%SNAP enrollment
21.0%Transit barriers
24.6%No health insurance
16.2%Frequent mental distress
51.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Vet's Park
At $409 a month, rents run 72% under what the rest of Chicago commands. The poverty rate is 41%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
91% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Disability prevalence runs 51.6% against 31.5% nationally. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1/10.
It sits 2.0 points above the Cook County average of 6.1. Annualized rent equals 34% of average household income of $14,311, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. Housing insecurity runs 30.3% against 14.2% nationally.
Running hot, local political climate reads 8.5/10. Severe burden reaches 18%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The filing record is not thin: 298 evictions over 15 years of observation.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031461000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031461000?
Census tract 17031461000 in the Vet's Park neighborhood scores 8.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031461000?
Median gross rent is $409/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031461000?
40.9% of residents in tract 17031461000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,346.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031461000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 93th, household 98th, minority 94th, housing 75th.
Q5
Is tract 17031461000 considered part of Vet's Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031461000 fall within Vet's Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031461000?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 298 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031461000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.03% of renter households, peaking at 5.2% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031461000 struggle to pay rent?
About 30.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 20.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031461000 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031461000 scores 8.1/10, higher than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031461000 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 72% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.