Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #18,163 of 84,120 nationally
Glendale Park Historic District Eviction Risk: Elevated , Calumet City
Tract 17031826100 · Cook County, IL · pop 4,698 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Census tract 17031826100 covers part of the Glendale Park Historic District area of Calumet City, IL, and scores 6/10 on landlord eviction risk. 28% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23%
Stable renters 31%
Owners 46%
Tract context
Occupied units2,161
Renter share53.4%
SVI overall0.73
Poverty rate21.6%
Median income$51,296
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
71
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
45
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
74
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Calumet City and the region
Centroid at 41.6048, -87.5356 · click any tract to drill in
Why Glendale Park Historic District scores 6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Calumet City
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
21.6% poverty · this tract
5.4
Supply constraint
$1,220 rent vs county FMR
1.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Calumet City
4.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Calumet City
3.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Calumet City
4.0
How Glendale Park Historic District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 73
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 81%Socioeconomic
- 48%Household composition
- 88%Racial/ethnic minority
- 49%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 1%Grade A
- 3%Grade B
- 17%Grade C
- 11%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 647Total filings over 15 yrs
- 6.31%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.4%Peak (2010)
- 53Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 36% over the past 15 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 27.4%Housing insecurity
- 17.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 33.4%Food insecurity
- 32.3%SNAP enrollment
- 15.5%Transit barriers
- 15.1%No health insurance
- 18.0%Frequent mental distress
- 33.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Glendale Park Historic District
The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1.9/10. Food insecurity runs 33.4% against 17.8% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 27.4% against 14.2% nationally.
Running hot, local political climate reads 7.8/10. The poverty rate is 22%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Sitting well above the midpoint, regional political climate reads 7.5/10.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 647 filings here across 15 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2010 at 7.4% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 6.3% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 78th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.5/10. Statewide the IL average is 5.1, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031826100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031826100?
Census tract 17031826100 in the Glendale Park Historic District neighborhood scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031826100?
Median gross rent is $1,220/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031826100?
21.6% of residents in tract 17031826100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,698.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031826100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 73th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 81th, household 48th, minority 88th, housing 49th.
Q5
Is tract 17031826100 considered part of Glendale Park Historic District?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031826100 fall within Glendale Park Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031826100?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 647 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031826100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.31% of renter households, peaking at 7.4% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031826100 struggle to pay rent?
About 27.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031826100 compare to Calumet City overall?
Tract 17031826100 scores 6/10, higher than the parent city of Calumet City at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Calumet City eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031826100 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 11% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Calumet City
Top eight tracts in Calumet City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related