Creekside Eviction Risk: Lower , Rolling Meadows
Tract 17031804109 · Cook County, IL · pop 3,138 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Census tract 17031804109 covers part of the Creekside area of Rolling Meadows, IL, and scores 3.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.9 points.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Rolling Meadows and the region
Centroid at 42.0755, -88.0367 · click any tract to drill in
Why Creekside scores 3.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Creekside compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 21
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 4%Socioeconomic
- 60%Household composition
- 35%Racial/ethnic minority
- 38%Housing & transportation
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 99Total filings over 14 yrs
- 1.37%Avg annual filing rate
- 6.3%Peak (2013)
- 1Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Creekside. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.2%Housing insecurity
- 3.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.2%Food insecurity
- 5.1%SNAP enrollment
- 4.0%Transit barriers
- 5.0%No health insurance
- 11.2%Frequent mental distress
- 21.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Creekside
The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.6/10.
Average gross rent is $1,165, 28% below the Rolling Meadows average. 18% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. SNAP participation runs 5.1% against 15.2% nationally.
Running hot, regional political climate reads 7.5/10. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 99 filings here across 14 tracked years.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.5% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Filings peaked in 2013 at 6.3% of renter households. In a typical year about 1.4% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 25% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 13% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 17031804109
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031804109?
What is the average rent in tract 17031804109?
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031804109?
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031804109?
Is tract 17031804109 considered part of Creekside?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031804109?
What share of households in tract 17031804109 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 17031804109 compare to Rolling Meadows overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Rolling Meadows
Top eight tracts in Rolling Meadows ranked by composite eviction-risk score.