Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
The Preserves Eviction Risk: Lower , Grayslake
Tract 17097861107 · Lake County, IL · pop 4,070 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
Census tract 17097861107 covers part of the The Preserves area of Grayslake, IL, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,070 residents. The severe-burden share is 78%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 1%
Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units1,336
Renter share6.4%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate3.5%
Median income$157,195
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
21
th percentile
Low
Within state
12
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Grayslake and the region
Centroid at 42.3630, -88.0557 · click any tract to drill in
Why The Preserves scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Grayslake
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
3.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,152 rent vs county FMR
7.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Grayslake
4.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Grayslake
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Grayslake
4.0
How The Preserves compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 3
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 25%Socioeconomic
- 9%Household composition
- 44%Racial/ethnic minority
- 1%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within The Preserves. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.3%Housing insecurity
- 4.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.9%Food insecurity
- 5.2%SNAP enrollment
- 4.4%Transit barriers
- 4.8%No health insurance
- 13.6%Frequent mental distress
- 17.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in The Preserves
78% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far above the Lake County average of 42.6%. At $2,152 a month, rents run 45% over what the rest of Grayslake commands. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10.
Disability prevalence runs 17.2% against 31.5% nationally. The voucher gap is 22.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
It sits 1.4 points below the Lake County average of 4.4. Food insecurity runs 6.9% against 17.8% nationally.
Running hot, supply constraint reads 7.2/10. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 6% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.3/10. Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $157,195, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 17097861107
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17097861107?
Census tract 17097861107 in the The Preserves neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17097861107?
Median gross rent is $2,152/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 78% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17097861107?
3.5% of residents in tract 17097861107 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,070.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17097861107?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 25th, household 9th, minority 44th, housing 1th.
Q5
Is tract 17097861107 considered part of The Preserves?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17097861107 fall within The Preserves (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 17097861107 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 17097861107 compare to Grayslake overall?
Tract 17097861107 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Grayslake at 4.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Grayslake; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Grayslake
Top eight tracts in Grayslake ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related