Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Masthead of Geist Harbours Eviction Risk: Lower , Fishers

Tract 18057110805 · Hamilton County, IN · pop 8,321 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

18057110805 is a census tract in the Masthead of Geist Harbours area of Fishers, IN. It scores 3/10 for landlords. It is home to 8,321 residents. roughly one in eight of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far below the Hamilton County average of 33.7%.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 3% Owners 97%
Tract context
Occupied units3,037
Renter share3.6%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate4.4%
Median income$152,297

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Masthead of Geist Harbours
Moderate
Within parent city
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 15 tracts In Fishers
Low
Within county
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#46 of 57 tracts In Hamilton County
Very Low
Within state
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#1,115 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fishers and the region

Centroid at 39.9432, -85.9802 · click any tract to drill in

Why Masthead of Geist Harbours scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fishers
5.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.7
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
4.4% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$1,848 rent vs county FMR
9.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fishers
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fishers
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fishers
3.5

How Masthead of Geist Harbours compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Masthead of Geist Harbours risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 1108053.4Fishersparent city3.6Countyavg tract in county3.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 4

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2Total filings over 1 yrs
  • 0.79%Avg annual filing rate
  • 0.8%Peak (2011)
  • 2Filings in 2011 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Masthead of Geist Harbours

The voucher gap is 44.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 9.4/10.

On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.1/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 2/10.

Food insecurity runs 5.6% against 17.8% nationally. The severe-burden share is 14%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Court records carry 2 eviction filings across 1 observed years. At $1,848 a month, rents run 15% over what the rest of Fishers commands. Against the Hamilton County average of 3.6, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.6 points.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. The worst year on record was 2011, when 0.8% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 0.8% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 4% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Against average income of $152,297, annual rent is just 15%.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 18057110805

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18057110805?

Census tract 18057110805 in the Masthead of Geist Harbours neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18057110805?

Median gross rent is $1,848/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 14% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18057110805?

4.4% of residents in tract 18057110805 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 8,321.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18057110805?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 14th, minority 22th, housing 13th.
Q5

Is tract 18057110805 considered part of Masthead of Geist Harbours?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18057110805 fall within Masthead of Geist Harbours (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 18057110805?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 18057110805 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.79% of renter households, peaking at 0.8% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 18057110805 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 18057110805 compare to Fishers overall?

Tract 18057110805 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Fishers at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fishers eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fishers

Top eight tracts in Fishers ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related