Brownsburg Eviction Risk: Lower

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.3/10. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.9/10.

Severe burden reaches 18%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Running cool, state political climate reads 2/10. SNAP participation runs 4.2% against 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 8.2% against 17.8% nationally. The voucher gap is 14.3%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

That is riskier than roughly 33% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 18% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

Social vulnerability reads 2.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.