Neighborhood · Ranked #61,757 of 84,120 nationally
Brantwood Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 18089040600 ·
Lake County, IN · pop 3,975 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Census tract 18089040600 sits in the Brantwood area of Lake, Indiana eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 3.9/10. It lands near the 11th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 28% of renter households, a moderate level, and 11% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,120 monthly, set against $77,522 in average yearly household income, roughly 17% of income at the averages. About 20% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.8
Lower
Confidence 65% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%Stable renters 14%Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,635
Renter share20.1%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate5.6%
Median income$77,522
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Brantwood
Moderate
Within parent city
60th percentile
#3 of 6 tracts In city
Elevated
Within county
33th percentile
#88 of 131 tracts In Lake County
Low
Within state
32th percentile
#1,147 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lake County and the region
Centroid at 41.5593, -87.4697 · click any tract to drill in
Why Brantwood scores 2.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
2.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
5.6% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,120 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
State baseline
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0
How Brantwood compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 41
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
27%Socioeconomic
58%Household composition
50%Racial/ethnic minority
50%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
8%Grade A
0%Grade B
14%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
9.7%Housing insecurity
7.1%Utility-shutoff threat
12.5%Food insecurity
6.3%SNAP enrollment
6.4%Transit barriers
8.3%No health insurance
16.0%Frequent mental distress
27.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Brantwood
What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are set by Indiana eviction laws law, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Lake County average of 5.2 and below the Indiana statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 41st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 18089040600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18089040600?
Census tract 18089040600 in the Brantwood neighborhood scores 2.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 18089040600?
Median gross rent is $1,120/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 18089040600?
5.6% of residents in tract 18089040600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,975.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 18089040600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 27th, household 58th, minority 50th, housing 50th.
Q5
Is tract 18089040600 considered part of Brantwood?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18089040600 fall within Brantwood (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 18089040600 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
Was tract 18089040600 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.