Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #56,048 of 84,120 nationally
Cassoday Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 20015020101 · Butler County, KS · pop 2,116 · 3% of tract blocks fall in Cassoday
Census tract 20015020101 covers part of Cassoday, KS, and scores 3.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,116 residents. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.
Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%
Stable renters 14%
Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units930
Renter share13.7%
SVI overall0.16
Poverty rate12.3%
Median income$70,833
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
67
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
58
th percentile
Elevated
National
33
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cassoday and the region
Centroid at 37.9662, -96.7632 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cassoday scores 3.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cassoday
3.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.9
State political climate
Kansas legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
12.3% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$936 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cassoday
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cassoday
3.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cassoday
2.0
How Cassoday compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 16
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 29%Socioeconomic
- 29%Household composition
- 8%Racial/ethnic minority
- 16%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.1%Housing insecurity
- 6.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.7%Food insecurity
- 6.0%SNAP enrollment
- 5.9%Transit barriers
- 7.4%No health insurance
- 16.1%Frequent mental distress
- 32.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Cassoday
Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.4/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 2/10. SNAP participation runs 6.0% against 15.2% nationally.
Food insecurity runs 10.7% against 17.8% nationally. Nationally it ranks #56,048 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 14% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
Social vulnerability reads 2.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Against average income of $70,833, annual rent is just 16%.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. It tracks the Butler County average of 3.7 closely. Average gross rent is $936, close to the Cassoday average.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 20015020101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 20015020101?
Census tract 20015020101 in Cassoday scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 20015020101?
Median gross rent is $936/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 0% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 20015020101?
12.3% of residents in tract 20015020101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,116.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 20015020101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 16th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 29th, household 29th, minority 8th, housing 16th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 20015020101 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 20015020101 compare to Cassoday overall?
Tract 20015020101 scores 3.6/10, higher than the parent city of Cassoday at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cassoday; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related