Skip to content
Elk Falls, Kansas eviction risk overview
City brief · 126 residents

Elk Falls, KS Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Elk County · Population 126

In 2026
Risk score
1.8
VERY LOW

17th percentile, Kansas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.4 Average1.7 Now1.8
2.8 1.4 1976 · score 1.7 1977 · score 1.7 1978 · score 1.7 1979 · score 1.7 1980 · score 1.8 1981 · score 1.7 1982 · score 1.9 1983 · score 1.8 1984 · score 1.7 1985 · score 1.4 1986 · score 1.4 1987 · score 1.4 1988 · score 1.4 1989 · score 1.4 1990 · score 1.4 1991 · score 1.5 1992 · score 1.7 1993 · score 1.8 1994 · score 1.8 1995 · score 1.8 1996 · score 1.7 1997 · score 1.6 1998 · score 1.6 1999 · score 1.5 2000 · score 1.6 2001 · score 1.7 2002 · score 1.7 2003 · score 1.7 2004 · score 1.7 2005 · score 1.7 2006 · score 1.7 2007 · score 1.7 2008 · score 1.9 2009 · score 2.0 2010 · score 2.1 2011 · score 2.0 2012 · score 1.9 2013 · score 1.8 2014 · score 1.7 2015 · score 1.7 2016 · score 1.7 2017 · score 1.7 2018 · score 1.7 2019 · score 1.7 2020 · score 2.6 2021 · score 2.8 2022 · score 1.9 2023 · score 2.0 2024 · score 1.8 2025 · score 1.8 2026 · score 1.8

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.4 Regional 2.4 State 2.0 Economic 3.5 Supply 4.8 Rent Control 1.1 Eviction 1.6 Tenant 4.8 Housing 1.2 1.8 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +69.7% (2024)
    2.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.4
  3. State political climate
    Kansas legislature & governorship
    2.0
  4. Economic stress
    12.6% poverty · 6.8% unemp.
    3.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $556 average · 22.8% renters
    4.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    33.8% of income on rent
    1.1
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    38 days filing → judgment
    1.6
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    22.8% renters
    4.8
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    1.2
Geographic context

Risk heat across Elk Falls and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Elk Falls compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Elk County
Low
#5 of 7 cities
Rank in county, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 7 cities in Elk County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Kansas
Very Low
#633 of 740 cities
Rank in state, 15th percentileLowHigh
#633 of 740 cities in Kansas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Elk Falls risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Elk Falls: 1.81.8Elk FallsThis cityCounty: 2.32.3Countyavg in countyState: 2.32.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 1.8
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 1.8/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 38d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $556/mo. A contested eviction takes 38 days and costs $1,216–$3,390 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 22.8%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 126 residents, 22.8% rent. 34% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 12.6% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.4 and 2.4 (GOP margin +69.7% (2024)). State climate at 2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.6, housing court bias 1.2, rent-control risk 1.1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.4 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 3.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 3.5. Supply constraint: 4.8. The numbers behind those: 12.6% poverty, 6.8% unemployment, 34% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Elk Falls sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Wichita, KS · 39d · ~$2.5k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.4 Wichita Overland Park, KS · 35d · ~$2.2k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.1 Overland Park Kansas City, KS · 40d · ~$4.1k all-in ($101/day) · score 2.7 Kansas City Olathe, KS · 40d · ~$2.2k all-in ($55/day) · score 2.1 Olathe Topeka, KS · 36d · ~$2.5k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.4 Topeka Lawrence, KS · 36d · ~$2.5k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.7 Lawrence Shawnee, KS · 34d · ~$2.3k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.1 Shawnee Lenexa, KS · 34d · ~$2.1k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.2 Lenexa Manhattan, KS · 34d · ~$2.2k all-in ($64/day) · score 2.4 Manhattan Kansas City, MO · 40d · ~$2.5k all-in ($63/day) · score 3 Kansas City Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Elk Falls
Elk Falls · 38d · ~$2.3k all-in ($61/day) · score 1.8 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Elk Falls, KS

Landlording in Elk Falls, Kansas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 1.8/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Elk Falls is a city of 126 residents where 22.8% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 33.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $556/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Elk Falls eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.6/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Elk Falls closes 38 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Elk Falls's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1.2/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Elk Falls runs $1,216 to $3,390 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 38 days of typical timeline and $556/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 4.8/10 in Elk Falls, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Kansas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Elk Falls: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Kansas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,390 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Elk Falls

Trap · 69.7 POINTS
Elk County voted Republican by 69.7 points in 2020, a baseline that correlates with landlord-neutral statutory bias under K.S.A. 58-2540.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant only pays a partial amount after the 3-day notice?

If you accept a partial payment after serving a 3-day notice, it can often void the notice. This means you'd have to serve a new notice and start the clock over. Generally, it's safer not to accept partial payments once you've initiated the eviction process, unless you have a clear, written agreement (and ideally legal advice) on how it impacts the eviction.

Q2

Can I turn off utilities if my tenant isn't paying rent in Elk Falls?

No. Absolutely not. Shutting off utilities, changing locks, or removing a tenant's belongings are considered "self-help" evictions and are illegal in Kansas. You could face serious penalties, including financial damages to the tenant. Always follow the legal eviction process through the courts.

Q3

How long does it take for the sheriff to remove a tenant after a court order?

Once the judge grants you a "Writ of Restitution" (the order for possession), the sheriff's office will typically execute it within a few days to a week, depending on their schedule. They will post a notice on the property giving the tenant a final chance to leave, then physically remove them if they haven't.

Q4

Does Kansas have rent control?

No, Kansas does not have statewide rent control. Municipalities are also prohibited from enacting rent control measures. This means you generally have the freedom to set market rates for your rental units. Learn more about this at our Kansas rent control rules page.

Q5

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Elk Falls?

While you can represent yourself in court, especially for straightforward non-payment cases, it's highly recommended to at least consult with an attorney. They understand the nuances of the law, can ensure all paperwork is filed correctly, and can navigate any unexpected challenges. For complex cases or if the tenant hires a lawyer, you should definitely have one too.

Q6

What if my tenant leaves property behind after eviction?

Kansas law (K.S.A. § 58-2565) has specific rules for handling abandoned property. You must store it for 30 days and provide written notice to the tenant's last known address. If they don't claim it, you can sell it or dispose of it, using proceeds to cover storage and sale costs. Don't just throw it out; follow the statute carefully.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 1.8/10 places Elk Falls in the 17th percentile of Kansas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.