Skip to content
Ottawa, Kansas eviction risk overview
City brief · 12,678 residents

Ottawa, KS Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Franklin County · Population 12,678

In 2026
Risk score
2
VERY LOW

45th percentile, Kansas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.4 Average1.8 Now2
2.8 1.4 1976 · score 1.8 1977 · score 1.8 1978 · score 1.7 1979 · score 1.8 1980 · score 1.8 1981 · score 1.8 1982 · score 1.9 1983 · score 1.8 1984 · score 1.7 1985 · score 1.4 1986 · score 1.4 1987 · score 1.4 1988 · score 1.5 1989 · score 1.4 1990 · score 1.5 1991 · score 1.5 1992 · score 1.8 1993 · score 1.8 1994 · score 1.9 1995 · score 1.8 1996 · score 1.8 1997 · score 1.7 1998 · score 1.7 1999 · score 1.6 2000 · score 1.6 2001 · score 1.7 2002 · score 1.7 2003 · score 1.7 2004 · score 1.7 2005 · score 1.7 2006 · score 1.6 2007 · score 1.7 2008 · score 1.9 2009 · score 2.1 2010 · score 2.1 2011 · score 2.1 2012 · score 1.9 2013 · score 1.9 2014 · score 1.8 2015 · score 1.7 2016 · score 1.7 2017 · score 1.7 2018 · score 1.7 2019 · score 1.7 2020 · score 2.6 2021 · score 2.8 2022 · score 2.0 2023 · score 2.0 2024 · score 2.0 2025 · score 2.0 2026 · score 2.0

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.8 Regional 3.8 State 2.0 Economic 4.8 Supply 6.7 Rent Control 6.3 Eviction 1.4 Tenant 7.9 Housing 5.9 2 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +40.1% (2024)
    3.8
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.8
  3. State political climate
    Kansas legislature & governorship
    2.0
  4. Economic stress
    10.7% poverty · 2.1% unemp.
    4.8
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,032 average · 40.2% renters
    6.7
  6. Rent Control risk
    25.0% of income on rent
    6.3
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    40 days filing → judgment
    1.4
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    40.2% renters
    7.9
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.9
Geographic context

Risk heat across Ottawa and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Ottawa compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Franklin County
Low
#6 of 9 cities
Rank in county, 38th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 9 cities in Franklin County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Kansas
Low
#487 of 740 cities
Rank in state, 34th percentileLowHigh
#487 of 740 cities in Kansas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Ottawa risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Ottawa: 2.02.0OttawaThis cityCounty: 2.02.0Countyavg in countyState: 2.32.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 40d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,032/mo. A contested eviction takes 40 days and costs $1,055–$3,705 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 40.2%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 12,678 residents, 40.2% rent. 25% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 10.7% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.8
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.8 and 3.8 (GOP margin +40.1% (2024)). State climate at 2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.4, housing court bias 5.9, rent-control risk 6.3. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.6 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.8
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.8. Supply constraint: 6.7. The numbers behind those: 10.7% poverty, 2.1% unemployment, 25% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Ottawa sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Overland Park, KS · 35d · ~$2.2k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.1 Overland Park Kansas City, KS · 40d · ~$4.1k all-in ($101/day) · score 2.7 Kansas City Olathe, KS · 40d · ~$2.2k all-in ($55/day) · score 2.1 Olathe Topeka, KS · 36d · ~$2.5k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.4 Topeka Lawrence, KS · 36d · ~$2.5k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.7 Lawrence Shawnee, KS · 34d · ~$2.3k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.1 Shawnee Lenexa, KS · 34d · ~$2.1k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.2 Lenexa Wichita, KS · 39d · ~$2.5k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.4 Wichita Manhattan, KS · 34d · ~$2.2k all-in ($64/day) · score 2.4 Manhattan Kansas City, MO · 40d · ~$2.5k all-in ($63/day) · score 3 Kansas City Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Ottawa
Ottawa · 40d · ~$2.4k all-in ($60/day) · score 2 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Ottawa, KS

Landlording in Ottawa, Kansas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Ottawa is a city of 12,678 residents where 40.2% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 25.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,032/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Ottawa eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.4/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Ottawa closes 40 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Ottawa's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.9/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Ottawa runs $1,055 to $3,705 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 40 days of typical timeline and $1,032/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7.9/10 in Ottawa, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (6.3/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Kansas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Ottawa: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Kansas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,705 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Ottawa

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Cost-versus-timeline trade-off: at 40 days and roughly $3,705 on the high end, cash-for-keys at $1,482 to $2,223 typically beats the legal route for non-aggravated cases. Default judgment frequency is high under K.S.A. 58-2540.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I really evict someone in 3 days in Ottawa, KS?

No, the 3-day notice is just the *start*. It gives the tenant 3 days to pay rent or move out. If they don't, you then have to file in court, serve them, wait for a hearing, and then wait for the sheriff to execute a Writ of Restitution. The whole process typically takes about 40 days in Ottawa, not 3 days.

Q2

What if my tenant pays part of the rent after I give them a 3-day notice?

Accepting partial payment after serving a 3-day pay-or-quit notice can nullify your notice, forcing you to start over with a new one. It's generally best to either accept the full amount or refuse any partial payment if you intend to proceed with eviction. If you do accept partial payment, get a written agreement that clarifies the notice remains valid or be prepared to issue a fresh notice.

Q3

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Franklin County?

While you are not legally required to have a lawyer, it's highly recommended, especially once you're past the initial notice. Eviction law has specific procedural requirements, and mistakes can cause significant delays and added costs. An attorney specializing in landlord-tenant law can navigate the Franklin County courts efficiently. This is especially true given the moderate rent-control-risk sub-score of 6.3 and housing-court-bias of 5.9, meaning it's not entirely a cakewalk.

Q4

How much can I charge for late fees in Kansas?

Kansas law does not specify a maximum late fee amount. However, any late fees charged must be "reasonable" and clearly stated in your lease agreement. Excessive late fees could be challenged in court as an unenforceable penalty. A common practice is 5-10% of the monthly rent.

Q5

Can I screen tenants based on their income source, like Section 8 vouchers?

Currently, Kansas does not have a statewide law prohibiting landlords from discriminating based on source of income. This means you generally do not have to accept Section 8 or other housing vouchers. However, always double-check for any local ordinances in Ottawa or Franklin County that may have adopted such protections, though none are currently widespread. Consistency in your screening practices is key to avoiding fair housing complaints.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2/10 places Ottawa in the 45th percentile of Kansas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.