Skip to content
Lansing, Kansas eviction risk overview
City brief · 11,246 residents

Lansing, KS Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Leavenworth County · Population 11,246

In 2026
Risk score
2.4
VERY LOW

85th percentile, Kansas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.5 Average1.9 Now2.4
3.1 1.5 1976 · score 1.9 1977 · score 1.9 1978 · score 1.8 1979 · score 1.8 1980 · score 1.9 1981 · score 1.8 1982 · score 1.9 1983 · score 1.9 1984 · score 1.8 1985 · score 1.5 1986 · score 1.5 1987 · score 1.5 1988 · score 1.5 1989 · score 1.5 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.6 1992 · score 1.9 1993 · score 1.9 1994 · score 1.9 1995 · score 1.9 1996 · score 1.9 1997 · score 1.8 1998 · score 1.7 1999 · score 1.7 2000 · score 1.7 2001 · score 1.7 2002 · score 1.8 2003 · score 1.8 2004 · score 1.7 2005 · score 1.7 2006 · score 1.7 2007 · score 1.7 2008 · score 2.0 2009 · score 2.1 2010 · score 2.2 2011 · score 2.2 2012 · score 2.0 2013 · score 2.0 2014 · score 1.9 2015 · score 1.9 2016 · score 1.9 2017 · score 1.9 2018 · score 1.9 2019 · score 2.0 2020 · score 2.9 2021 · score 3.1 2022 · score 2.2 2023 · score 2.3 2024 · score 2.4 2025 · score 2.4 2026 · score 2.4

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.5 Regional 4.5 State 2.0 Economic 5.0 Supply 5.8 Rent Control 4.9 Eviction 2.3 Tenant 4.4 Housing 4.0 2.4 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +22.8% (2024)
    4.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.5
  3. State political climate
    Kansas legislature & governorship
    2.0
  4. Economic stress
    5.2% poverty · 5.3% unemp.
    5.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,406 average · 21.3% renters
    5.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    28.3% of income on rent
    4.9
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    40 days filing → judgment
    2.3
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    21.3% renters
    4.4
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.0
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lansing and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Lansing compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Leavenworth County
Elevated
#3 of 7 cities
Rank in county, 67th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 7 cities in Leavenworth County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Kansas
High
#147 of 740 cities
Rank in state, 80th percentileLowHigh
#147 of 740 cities in Kansas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Lansing risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Lansing: 2.42.4LansingThis cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg in countyState: 2.32.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.4
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.5 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 40d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,406/mo. A contested eviction takes 40 days and costs $1,126–$3,775 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 21.3%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 11,246 residents, 21.3% rent. 28% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 5.2% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.5 and 4.5 (GOP margin +22.8% (2024)). State climate at 2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.3, housing court bias 4, rent-control risk 4.9. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.7 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5. Supply constraint: 5.8. The numbers behind those: 5.2% poverty, 5.3% unemployment, 28% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Lansing sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Overland Park, KS · 35d · ~$2.2k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.1 Overland Park Kansas City, KS · 40d · ~$4.1k all-in ($101/day) · score 2.7 Kansas City Olathe, KS · 40d · ~$2.2k all-in ($55/day) · score 2.1 Olathe Topeka, KS · 36d · ~$2.5k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.4 Topeka Lawrence, KS · 36d · ~$2.5k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.7 Lawrence Shawnee, KS · 34d · ~$2.3k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.1 Shawnee Lenexa, KS · 34d · ~$2.1k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.2 Lenexa Wichita, KS · 39d · ~$2.5k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.4 Wichita Manhattan, KS · 34d · ~$2.2k all-in ($64/day) · score 2.4 Manhattan Kansas City, MO · 40d · ~$2.5k all-in ($63/day) · score 3 Kansas City Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Lansing
Lansing · 40d · ~$2.5k all-in ($61/day) · score 2.4 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Lansing, KS

Landlording in Lansing, Kansas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.4/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Lansing is a city of 11,246 residents where 21.3% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 28.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,406/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Lansing eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.3/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Lansing closes 40 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Lansing's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Lansing runs $1,126 to $3,775 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 40 days of typical timeline and $1,406/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 4.4/10 in Lansing, and the city has limited rent control exposure (4.9/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Kansas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Lansing: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Kansas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,775 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Lansing

Trap · 4.9/10
Comparative benchmarking matters in markets like this. Lansing's 3.9/10 is below the Kansas state average. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 4.9/10. See the nearby cities grid below for direct A-vs-B comparison.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the absolute fastest I can get a tenant out for not paying rent in Lansing?

The absolute fastest would involve serving a 3-day pay-or-quit notice immediately. If they don't pay, you file on day 4. Court dates are often within 7-14 days. If you win and they still don't leave, you get a writ of restitution, and the sheriff could execute it within a few more days. In a perfect, uncontested scenario, you might get them out in 2-3 weeks, but the typical timeline is closer to 40 days when you factor in all steps and potential delays.

Q2

Can I charge extra for a pet deposit in Lansing?

Yes, you can charge a pet deposit in Kansas. However, it counts towards your overall security deposit limit. Since the cap is 1.00 month's rent, your total security deposit, including any pet deposit, cannot exceed that amount. For example, if rent is $1,406, your total security deposit (base + pet) can't be more than $1,406.

Q3

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Lansing?

While you can represent yourself in Kansas district court for an eviction, it's highly recommended to consult or hire an attorney, especially if you're new to the process or if the tenant is contesting the eviction. An attorney ensures all legal procedures are followed, reducing the risk of costly mistakes or delays. Given the typical eviction cost range, legal fees are a worthwhile investment for a smooth process.

Q4

What if the tenant leaves belongings behind after an eviction?

In Kansas, you have specific procedures for handling abandoned property. You generally need to store the property for a certain period (usually 30 days) and send notice to the tenant's last known address. If they don't claim it, you can dispose of it or sell it. Consult K.S.A. § 58-2565 for the exact requirements to avoid liability. Do not just throw everything out immediately.

Q5

Is "cash for keys" a legal option in Kansas?

Yes, "cash for keys" is a legal and often effective strategy in Kansas. It's a voluntary agreement between you and the tenant to vacate the property in exchange for an agreed-upon sum of money. It's essentially a settlement to avoid the formal eviction process. Always put the agreement in writing and ensure the tenant vacates and returns keys before releasing the funds.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.4/10 places Lansing in the 85th percentile of Kansas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.