Skip to content
Cawker City, Kansas eviction risk overview
City brief · 352 residents

Cawker City, KS Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Mitchell County · Population 352

In 2026
Risk score
2.1
VERY LOW

56th percentile, Kansas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.4 Average1.8 Now2.1
2.8 1.4 1976 · score 1.8 1977 · score 1.8 1978 · score 1.7 1979 · score 1.7 1980 · score 1.8 1981 · score 1.8 1982 · score 1.9 1983 · score 1.8 1984 · score 1.8 1985 · score 1.4 1986 · score 1.5 1987 · score 1.4 1988 · score 1.4 1989 · score 1.4 1990 · score 1.5 1991 · score 1.5 1992 · score 1.8 1993 · score 1.8 1994 · score 1.8 1995 · score 1.8 1996 · score 1.8 1997 · score 1.7 1998 · score 1.6 1999 · score 1.6 2000 · score 1.6 2001 · score 1.6 2002 · score 1.7 2003 · score 1.7 2004 · score 1.7 2005 · score 1.6 2006 · score 1.6 2007 · score 1.6 2008 · score 1.8 2009 · score 2.0 2010 · score 2.0 2011 · score 2.0 2012 · score 1.9 2013 · score 1.8 2014 · score 1.7 2015 · score 1.7 2016 · score 1.7 2017 · score 1.7 2018 · score 1.7 2019 · score 1.8 2020 · score 2.6 2021 · score 2.8 2022 · score 2.0 2023 · score 2.0 2024 · score 2.1 2025 · score 2.1 2026 · score 2.1

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.7 Regional 2.7 State 2.0 Economic 5.6 Supply 2.6 Rent Control 1.2 Eviction 1.6 Tenant 1.0 Housing 2.0 2.1 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +65.6% (2024)
    2.7
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.7
  3. State political climate
    Kansas legislature & governorship
    2.0
  4. Economic stress
    8.8% poverty · 1.6% unemp.
    5.6
  5. Supply constraint
    $583 average · 18.1% renters
    2.6
  6. Rent Control risk
    23.6% of income on rent
    1.2
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    35 days filing → judgment
    1.6
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    18.1% renters
    1.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    2.0
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cawker City and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Cawker City compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Mitchell County
Elevated
#3 of 8 cities
Rank in county, 71st percentileLowHigh
#3 of 8 cities in Mitchell County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Kansas
Moderate
#338 of 740 cities
Rank in state, 54th percentileLowHigh
#338 of 740 cities in Kansas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Cawker City risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Cawker City: 2.12.1Cawker CityThis cityCounty: 2.02.0Countyavg in countyState: 2.32.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.1
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.1/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.3 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 35d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $583/mo. A contested eviction takes 35 days and costs $1,046–$3,798 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 18.1%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 352 residents, 18.1% rent. 24% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 8.8% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.7
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.7 and 2.7 (GOP margin +65.6% (2024)). State climate at 2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.6, housing court bias 2, rent-control risk 1.2. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.4 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.6
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.6. Supply constraint: 2.6. The numbers behind those: 8.8% poverty, 1.6% unemployment, 24% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Cawker City sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Wichita, KS · 39d · ~$2.5k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.4 Wichita Overland Park, KS · 35d · ~$2.2k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.1 Overland Park Kansas City, KS · 40d · ~$4.1k all-in ($101/day) · score 2.7 Kansas City Olathe, KS · 40d · ~$2.2k all-in ($55/day) · score 2.1 Olathe Topeka, KS · 36d · ~$2.5k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.4 Topeka Lawrence, KS · 36d · ~$2.5k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.7 Lawrence Shawnee, KS · 34d · ~$2.3k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.1 Shawnee Lenexa, KS · 34d · ~$2.1k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.2 Lenexa Manhattan, KS · 34d · ~$2.2k all-in ($64/day) · score 2.4 Manhattan Lincoln, NE · 28d · ~$2.2k all-in ($79/day) · score 3.1 Lincoln Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Cawker City
Cawker City · 35d · ~$2.4k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.1 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Cawker City, KS

Landlording in Cawker City, Kansas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.1/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Cawker City is a city of 352 residents where 18.1% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 23.6% of income on rent. At an average rent of $583/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Cawker City eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.6/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Cawker City closes 35 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Cawker City's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 2/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Cawker City runs $1,046 to $3,798 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 35 days of typical timeline and $583/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 1/10 in Cawker City, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.2/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Kansas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Cawker City: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Kansas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,798 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Cawker City

Trap · 2/10
For landlords, the 2.4/10 score is most actionable when combined with Mitchell County's specific court behavior. Housing-court bias sub-score: 2/10. Standard documentation and prompt action typically resolve cases quickly.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the fastest way to get a non-paying tenant out in Cawker City?

The fastest route is usually the 3-day pay-or-quit notice, followed immediately by filing for eviction if they don't comply. Don't delay. Every day you wait costs you rent.
Q2

Can I just change the locks if my tenant stops paying rent?

Absolutely not. Changing locks or shutting off utilities is illegal self-help eviction in Kansas and can lead to serious penalties, including financial damages to the tenant. You must follow the formal eviction process.
Q3

Do I need an attorney for an eviction in Mitchell County?

While not legally required for landlords, it's highly recommended. An attorney ensures all notices are correct, court procedures are followed, and your case is presented effectively, minimizing delays and potential errors.
Q4

What if my tenant claims the property is uninhabitable to avoid eviction?

This is a common tactic. Ensure your property is well-maintained and document all repairs and tenant communications. If a tenant brings up habitability issues, address them promptly and keep records. Kansas law requires tenants to give written notice of issues before withholding rent.
Q5

How long do I have to return a security deposit in Cawker City?

You have 30 days from the tenant vacating the property and returning the keys to either return the full deposit or provide an itemized list of deductions. Stick to this deadline or risk owing the tenant double. For more on tenant rights, check out our Kansas tenant protections guide.
Q6

Can I charge late fees in Cawker City?

Yes, you can charge reasonable late fees as outlined in your lease agreement. Kansas law doesn't set a specific cap, but they must be reasonable and reflect your actual damages from late payment, not be punitive.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.1/10 places Cawker City in the 56th percentile of Kansas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.