Skip to content
Gaylord, Kansas eviction risk overview
City brief · 70 residents

Gaylord, KS Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Smith County · Population 70

In 2026
Risk score
2.1
VERY LOW

56th percentile, Kansas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.6 Average2.0 Now2.1
3.0 1.6 1976 · score 1.9 1977 · score 1.9 1978 · score 1.9 1979 · score 1.9 1980 · score 2.0 1981 · score 1.9 1982 · score 2.1 1983 · score 2.0 1984 · score 1.9 1985 · score 1.6 1986 · score 1.6 1987 · score 1.6 1988 · score 1.6 1989 · score 1.6 1990 · score 1.7 1991 · score 1.7 1992 · score 2.0 1993 · score 2.0 1994 · score 2.0 1995 · score 2.0 1996 · score 1.9 1997 · score 1.9 1998 · score 1.8 1999 · score 1.7 2000 · score 1.8 2001 · score 1.9 2002 · score 1.9 2003 · score 1.9 2004 · score 1.9 2005 · score 1.9 2006 · score 1.8 2007 · score 1.8 2008 · score 2.0 2009 · score 2.2 2010 · score 2.2 2011 · score 2.2 2012 · score 2.0 2013 · score 2.0 2014 · score 1.9 2015 · score 1.9 2016 · score 1.9 2017 · score 1.9 2018 · score 1.9 2019 · score 1.9 2020 · score 2.8 2021 · score 3.0 2022 · score 2.2 2023 · score 2.2 2024 · score 2.0 2025 · score 2.1 2026 · score 2.1

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.5 Regional 2.5 State 2.0 Economic 4.7 Supply 4.0 Rent Control 1.9 Eviction 2.1 Tenant 7.0 Housing 5.1 2.1 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +68.5% (2024)
    2.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.5
  3. State political climate
    Kansas legislature & governorship
    2.0
  4. Economic stress
    22.4% poverty · 2.0% unemp.
    4.7
  5. Supply constraint
    $575 average · 33.3% renters
    4.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    45.0% of income on rent
    1.9
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    38 days filing → judgment
    2.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    33.3% renters
    7.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Gaylord and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Gaylord compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Smith County
Very High
#1 of 6 cities
Rank in county, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 6 cities in Smith County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Kansas
Moderate
#353 of 740 cities
Rank in state, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#353 of 740 cities in Kansas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Gaylord risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Gaylord: 2.12.1GaylordThis cityCounty: 2.12.1Countyavg in countyState: 2.32.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.1
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.1/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 38d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $575/mo. A contested eviction takes 38 days and costs $1,354–$3,427 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 33.3%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 70 residents, 33.3% rent. 45% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 22.4% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.5 and 2.5 (GOP margin +68.5% (2024)). State climate at 2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.1, housing court bias 5.1, rent-control risk 1.9. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.9 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.7
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.7. Supply constraint: 4. The numbers behind those: 22.4% poverty, 2.0% unemployment, 45% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Gaylord sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Wichita, KS · 39d · ~$2.5k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.4 Wichita Overland Park, KS · 35d · ~$2.2k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.1 Overland Park Kansas City, KS · 40d · ~$4.1k all-in ($101/day) · score 2.7 Kansas City Olathe, KS · 40d · ~$2.2k all-in ($55/day) · score 2.1 Olathe Topeka, KS · 36d · ~$2.5k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.4 Topeka Lawrence, KS · 36d · ~$2.5k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.7 Lawrence Shawnee, KS · 34d · ~$2.3k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.1 Shawnee Lenexa, KS · 34d · ~$2.1k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.2 Lenexa Manhattan, KS · 34d · ~$2.2k all-in ($64/day) · score 2.4 Manhattan Lincoln, NE · 28d · ~$2.2k all-in ($79/day) · score 3.1 Lincoln Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Gaylord
Gaylord · 38d · ~$2.4k all-in ($63/day) · score 2.1 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Gaylord, KS

Landlording in Gaylord, Kansas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.1/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Gaylord is a city of 70 residents where 33.3% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 45.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $575/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Gaylord eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Gaylord closes 38 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Gaylord's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Gaylord runs $1,354 to $3,427 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 38 days of typical timeline and $575/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7/10 in Gaylord, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.9/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Kansas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Gaylord: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Kansas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,427 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Gaylord

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Compare Gaylord to neighboring cities in Smith County via the grid below. The 3.2/10 score is computed from nine sub-factors plus a state-law multiplier under K.S.A. 58-2540. Smith County 2020 presidential margin: R+67.2. Cross-reference the state overview link in the guides section for Kansas statutory detail.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant disappears without notice?

If a tenant abandons the property and leaves personal belongings, Kansas law dictates how you must handle those items. You can't just throw them out. Generally, you need to provide notice to the tenant's last known address, giving them time to reclaim their property. If they don't, you can dispose of or sell the items, often applying proceeds to unpaid rent or damages. Consult K.S.A. § 58-2565 for exact procedures.
Q2

Can I turn off utilities if a tenant doesn't pay rent?

Absolutely not. Turning off utilities, changing locks, or otherwise attempting to self-help evict a tenant is illegal in Kansas. These actions can result in significant penalties, including financial damages owed to the tenant. Always follow the legal eviction process through the courts.
Q3

How often can I raise the rent in Gaylord?

Kansas has no statewide rent control. This means you can raise the rent as often as you deem necessary, provided you give proper notice. For month-to-month tenancies, a 30-day written notice is typically required before the rent increase takes effect. For tenants on a fixed-term lease, you can only raise the rent upon renewal of the lease, unless the lease itself specifies otherwise.
Q4

What if my tenant causes damage beyond the security deposit?

If the cost of repairs for tenant-caused damage exceeds the security deposit, you can sue the tenant in small claims court for the difference. Document all damages with photos, videos, and repair invoices. Be prepared to present this evidence to the court.
Q5

Do I need to accept partial rent payments?

No, you are not obligated to accept partial rent payments. If you accept a partial payment after issuing a 3-day pay-or-quit notice, it might waive your right to proceed with the eviction based on that notice. It's often best to insist on full payment or proceed with the eviction process. If you do accept a partial payment, ensure you have a clear written agreement that it does not waive your rights to pursue the remaining balance or continue with the eviction.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.1/10 places Gaylord in the 56th percentile of Kansas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.