Skip to content
Map of New Hampshire eviction risk by county

Lease Break Fee & Early Termination Rules in New Hampshire 2026

Duty to mitigate, state DV early-termination protections, and the federal SCRA military exception, what a New Hampshire landlord can and cannot charge after a tenant breaks the lease.

Case law Duty to mitigate damages
Yes State DV early-termination statute
30 days Federal SCRA military notice period
VAWA Federal DV protection in covered housing
Federal baseline (uniform in New Hampshire as in every state):
  • SCRA, 50 U.S.C. § 3955: a servicemember on PCS or 90+ day deployment may terminate any residential lease with 30 days\' written notice after the next rent due date. Lease-break fees are void against a qualifying SCRA termination.
  • VAWA, 34 U.S.C. § 12491: in HUD-covered housing (public housing, HCV/Section 8, project-based, LIHTC, HOME, HOPWA), DV/SA/dating-violence/stalking victims may terminate without liability, independent of state law.

If you break a lease early in New Hampshire, the most important thing to understand is how little the law lets a landlord pile onto you. New Hampshire follows a court-recognized duty to mitigate under Sommers v. Comstock, 163 N.H. 130 (2011), which means your former landlord cannot simply let the unit sit empty and bill you for every remaining month. Instead, the landlord must make reasonable efforts to re-rent the apartment, and you generally owe only the rent lost while the unit sits reasonably vacant, plus genuine costs of finding a new tenant.

With New Hampshire's average rent around $1,280, that distinction matters: a tenant who leaves nine months early in a no-mitigation state could theoretically be on the hook for nearly nine months of rent, but here that exposure shrinks to whatever the landlord reasonably loses before a replacement signs. The sections below explain what a landlord may lawfully charge, how the duty to mitigate works, the early-exit path for domestic violence survivors under RSA 540:2, and the federal SCRA exception for servicemembers.

How New Hampshire Treats the Duty to Mitigate

New Hampshire case law recognizes a duty to mitigate. RSA § 540:2 allows DV victims to terminate the lease.

Case-law mitigation duty: New Hampshire appellate courts have recognized a duty to mitigate damages. Leading authority: Sommers v. Comstock, 163 N.H. 130 (2011). The tenant typically owes only the rent lost during the period the unit was reasonably vacant despite the landlord's good-faith re-letting efforts.

Domestic-Violence Early Termination in New Hampshire

State DV statute on the books: RSA § 540:2. The statute requires written notice plus qualifying documentation (typically a protection order, police report, or qualified third-party statement).

The state DV statute operates in addition to, not instead of, the federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), which independently protects DV/SA/dating-violence/stalking victims in HUD-covered housing programs (public housing, HCV/Section 8, project-based, LIHTC, HOME, HOPWA). A New Hampshire tenant in covered housing has the benefit of whichever statute is more protective on the facts.

What a New Hampshire landlord can lawfully charge, and what crosses into a penalty

Because of the duty to mitigate, a New Hampshire landlord's recovery is tied to actual loss, not a punitive flat charge. Lawful items typically include the rent that accrues while the unit sits reasonably vacant, reasonable advertising or re-letting costs, and any documented damage beyond normal wear. What a landlord generally cannot do is demand the entire balance of the lease as a lump sum while ignoring the obligation to find a replacement tenant, that begins to look like an unenforceable penalty rather than compensation for real damages.

If your lease contains a fixed "early termination fee," it is enforceable only to the extent it reasonably estimates the landlord's actual loss. Once the apartment is re-rented, the rent owed by the new tenant offsets what you owe. Keep records: dates the landlord listed the unit, asking rent, and when a new lease started all bear directly on the final number.

The duty to mitigate: why Sommers v. Comstock limits your bill

The controlling authority is Sommers v. Comstock, 163 N.H. 130 (2011), in which the New Hampshire Supreme Court recognized that a landlord seeking damages after a tenant's early departure must take reasonable steps to re-let the premises. This is the same mitigation principle followed in most states, and it works strongly in a departing tenant's favor: the landlord cannot recover rent for a period during which the unit could have been re-rented with reasonable effort.

In practice, that means your exposure is the rent lost during a reasonable re-rental gap, not the full remaining term. A landlord who refuses to advertise, turns away qualified applicants, or insists on above-market rent may forfeit some or all of the claim. If a dispute reaches a New Hampshire court, the burden is on the landlord to show the unit could not reasonably have been re-let, a meaningful check that keeps the bill honest.

Early termination for domestic violence survivors under RSA 540:2

New Hampshire gives domestic violence survivors a statutory path out of a lease. Under RSA 540:2, a tenant who is a victim of domestic violence may terminate the tenancy and end the obligation to pay future rent, separate from the ordinary mitigation analysis. This is a protective right, not a penalty exception, it exists so that a survivor is not financially trapped in a dangerous living situation.

To rely on it, follow the statute's procedures carefully: provide the landlord with written notice and the documentation the law requires (such as a protective order or qualifying proof), and keep copies of everything you send. Because this is a safety-driven statute, eligible survivors generally are not held to the same lost-rent calculation that applies to an ordinary voluntary move-out. If you are unsure whether your situation qualifies, a local legal-aid organization or domestic violence advocate can confirm the steps before you give notice.

Active-duty servicemembers: the federal SCRA exception

If you are an active-duty servicemember, federal law overrides your lease. The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. § 3955) lets you terminate a residential lease after entering active duty or receiving qualifying permanent-change-of-station or deployment orders of 90 days or more. You deliver written notice plus a copy of your orders; the lease ends 30 days after the next rent payment is due following that notice.

This is one of the strongest exits available, and the stakes for landlords are high: refusing a valid SCRA termination or imposing an early-termination penalty against a protected servicemember can expose a landlord to federal liability. SCRA applies nationwide, so it works the same in New Hampshire as anywhere else and sits on top of, not instead of, the state's duty-to-mitigate rule. Survivors of domestic violence may also have overlapping protection under federal VAWA (34 U.S.C. § 12491) for covered housing.

The Cost of Mishandling a New Hampshire Lease Break

SCRA double trouble: charging a lease-break fee or pursuing remaining rent against a qualifying servicemember can expose the landlord to federal civil suit, statutory damages, attorney's fees, and DOJ pattern-or-practice enforcement under 50 U.S.C. § 4042. The Department of Justice has obtained multimillion-dollar settlements from national management companies for SCRA violations. Verify orders before charging anything.

The most common New Hampshire mistake is letting an early-termination clause sit in the lease, charging it automatically, and not bothering to re-list the unit. In a duty-to-mitigate jurisdiction, that pattern is a losing posture: the tenant's lawyer asks one question, "what did you do to re-rent?", and the answer determines the case.

City-Level Eviction Risk in New Hampshire

Lease-break disputes correlate with overall landlord-tenant litigation rates. View landlord risk and tenant-law profile by city:

Sources & Methodology

Related Guides for New Hampshire

This page summarizes New Hampshire's duty-to-mitigate rule as recognized in Sommers v. Comstock, 163 N.H. 130 (2011), the state's domestic violence lease-termination provision at RSA 540:2, and the federal protections under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. § 3955) and the Violence Against Women Act (34 U.S.C. § 12491). Last reviewed June 2026. This is general information, not legal advice; consult a licensed New Hampshire attorney or local legal-aid office about your specific situation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does my landlord in New Hampshire have to try to re-rent after I leave?

Yes. Under Sommers v. Comstock, 163 N.H. 130 (2011), a New Hampshire landlord has a duty to mitigate, meaning they must make reasonable efforts to re-rent the unit rather than let it sit empty and bill you for the whole remaining term. You generally owe only the rent lost during a reasonable vacancy, plus genuine re-letting costs, and any rent collected from a new tenant offsets your bill.

Can an active-duty servicemember break a lease in New Hampshire?

Yes. The federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. § 3955) lets active-duty members terminate a residential lease after receiving qualifying orders, active-duty entry, or PCS/deployment of 90 days or more. You give written notice with a copy of your orders, and the lease ends 30 days after the next rent due date. A landlord who penalizes a valid SCRA termination risks federal liability.

Can a domestic violence victim break a lease early in New Hampshire?

Yes. Under RSA 540:2, a tenant who is a domestic violence victim may terminate the tenancy and end future rent liability, outside the ordinary lost-rent analysis. Provide written notice and the documentation the statute requires (such as a protective order), and keep copies. A local legal-aid office or DV advocate can confirm the exact steps before you give notice.

What can a landlord actually charge me for breaking a lease in New Hampshire?

Realistically, the rent that accrues while the unit sits reasonably vacant, reasonable advertising or re-letting costs, and any damage beyond normal wear. Because of the duty to mitigate, a landlord cannot demand the entire remaining lease balance while ignoring the obligation to find a replacement. A fixed early-termination fee is enforceable only to the extent it reasonably reflects the landlord's actual loss.

Federal authority: 50 U.S.C. § 3955 (SCRA); 34 U.S.C. § 12491 (VAWA). State authority: Sommers v. Comstock, 163 N.H. 130 (2011); RSA § 540:2 (DV). Last updated August 28, 2026. For informational purposes only, not legal advice. Lease-break questions are highly fact-specific; consult a licensed New Hampshire attorney before charging or refusing an early-termination fee.