Tract 23005004701 Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 23005004701 · Cumberland County, ME · pop 2,219
Tract 23005004701 sits in Cumberland County, ME, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.3/10. Population here is 2,219. Cost burden runs 19% here against 38.5% across Cumberland County.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Cumberland County and the region
Centroid at 43.8819, -70.3789 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 23005004701 scores 4.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Tract 23005004701 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 7
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 17%Socioeconomic
- 7%Household composition
- 4%Racial/ethnic minority
- 20%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.0%Housing insecurity
- 6.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.1%Food insecurity
- 11.0%SNAP enrollment
- 6.5%Transit barriers
- 5.9%No health insurance
- 16.5%Frequent mental distress
- 27.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Tract 23005004701
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 2.8/10. Food insecurity runs 8.1% against 17.8% nationally.
Severe burden reaches 9%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Against the Cumberland County average of 5.0, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points. On the national scale it lands near the 47th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
At 7% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Model confidence here is 65%, lower than typical because some ACS inputs for this tract carry wide margins of error, so read the score as a band, not a point. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.