Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally

Central Square Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Stoneham

Tract 25017337102 · Middlesex County, MA · pop 5,668 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Census tract 25017337102 covers part of the Central Square Historic District area of Stoneham, MA, and scores 5.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,668 residents. Cost burden runs 26% here against 43.0% across Middlesex County.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 8% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units2,059
Renter share11.4%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate4.6%
Median income$143,365

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Central Square Historic District
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 5 tracts In Stoneham
Very Low
Within county
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#252 of 357 tracts In Middlesex County
Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#1,057 of 1,613 tracts In Massachusetts
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Stoneham and the region

Centroid at 42.4668, -71.0883 · click any tract to drill in

Why Central Square Historic District scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Stoneham
8.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
4.6% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$2,282 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Stoneham
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Stoneham
6.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Stoneham
4.2

How Central Square Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Central Square Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.1This tracttract 3371025.9Stonehamparent city6.3Countyavg tract in county6.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 10

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 20Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 1.16%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.7%Peak (2012)
  • 2Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2012 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 25017337102
Filings dropped 78% over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 0Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2023-11-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Central Square Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Central Square Historic District

The main counterweight is economic stress at 1.1/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 8.3/10. The severe-burden share is 16%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Against the Middlesex County average of 6.3, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.2 points. Running cool, court filing pressure reads 2.5/10. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 20 filings here across 5 tracked years.

Adults with no health insurance runs 3.0% against 11.3% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 7.0% against 14.2% nationally. Average gross rent is $2,282, 12% above the Stoneham average.

Filings peaked in 2012 at 2.7% of renter households. In a typical year about 1.2% of renter households face a filing.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 25017337102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25017337102?

Census tract 25017337102 in the Central Square Historic District neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 25017337102?

Median gross rent is $2,282/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 25017337102?

4.6% of residents in tract 25017337102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,668.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 25017337102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 10th, household 16th, minority 23th, housing 24th.
Q5

Is tract 25017337102 considered part of Central Square Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25017337102 fall within Central Square Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25017337102?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 20 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 25017337102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.16% of renter households, peaking at 2.7% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 25017337102 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 25017337102 compare to Stoneham overall?

Tract 25017337102 scores 5.1/10, lower than the parent city of Stoneham at 5.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Stoneham; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Stoneham

Top eight tracts in Stoneham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related