Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,043 of 84,120 nationally

Oakwood Eviction Risk: Elevated , East Lansing

Tract 26065004100 · Ingham County, MI · pop 5,166 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 26065004100 covers part of the Oakwood area of East Lansing, MI, and scores 7.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,166 residents. Severe burden reaches 74%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
7.8
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 75% Stable renters 17% Owners 8%
Tract context
Occupied units1,754
Renter share91.8%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate59.5%
Median income$23,480

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Oakwood
Moderate
Within parent city
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#8 of 19 tracts In East Lansing
Elevated
Within county
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 84 tracts In Ingham County
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across East Lansing and the region

Centroid at 42.7367, -84.4830 · click any tract to drill in

Why Oakwood scores 7.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from East Lansing
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
59.5% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$1,200 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from East Lansing
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from East Lansing
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from East Lansing
9.5

How Oakwood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Oakwood risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.8This tracttract 0041006.4East Lansingparent city4.6Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 47

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Oakwood

Against Ingham County at 46.5%, 81% of renters here are cost-burdened. Set annual rent against average income of $23,480 and the ratio lands at 61%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. It sits 3.2 points above the Ingham County average of 4.6.

The dominant input is economic stress at 10/10. The poverty rate is 60%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 9.6/10. This is renter territory: 92% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 9.6/10.

Disability prevalence runs 44.3% against 31.5% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 17.8% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

On the national scale it lands near the 89th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.2/10.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 26065004100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26065004100?

Census tract 26065004100 in the Oakwood neighborhood scores 7.8/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26065004100?

Median gross rent is $1,200/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 81% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26065004100?

59.5% of residents in tract 26065004100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,166.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26065004100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 73th, household 1th, minority 25th, housing 92th.
Q5

Is tract 26065004100 considered part of Oakwood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26065004100 fall within Oakwood (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 26065004100 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 26065004100 compare to East Lansing overall?

Tract 26065004100 scores 7.8/10, higher than the parent city of East Lansing at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from East Lansing eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 26065004100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in East Lansing

Top eight tracts in East Lansing ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related