Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally
Lansing-Eaton Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 26045020202 · Eaton County, MI · pop 4,681 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
With a score of 5.4/10, tract 26045020202 in the Lansing-Eaton area of Lansing, MI reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,681 residents. roughly one in two of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Eaton County average of 35.6%.
Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17%
Stable renters 16%
Owners 67%
Tract context
Occupied units1,779
Renter share32.6%
SVI overall0.72
Poverty rate16.0%
Median income$58,229
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
88
th percentile
High
Within county
96
th percentile
Very High
Within state
82
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lansing and the region
Centroid at 42.7008, -84.6218 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lansing-Eaton scores 5.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Lansing
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
16.0% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$1,045 rent vs county FMR
4.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lansing
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lansing
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lansing
4.5
How Lansing-Eaton compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 72
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 61%Socioeconomic
- 94%Household composition
- 72%Racial/ethnic minority
- 45%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 9%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 2,154Total filings over 8 yrs
- 34.47%Avg annual filing rate
- 43.0%Peak (2017)
- 326Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 21% over the past 8 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 18.0%Housing insecurity
- 13.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 23.1%Food insecurity
- 23.0%SNAP enrollment
- 11.8%Transit barriers
- 8.6%No health insurance
- 19.5%Frequent mental distress
- 34.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lansing-Eaton
The severe-burden share is 29%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9/10. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 2/10.
Against the Eaton County average of 4.0, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.4 points. Court records carry 2,154 eviction filings across 8 observed years. SNAP participation runs 23.0% against 15.2% nationally.
The worst year on record was 2017, when 43.0% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 34.5% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 70% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.5/10. Statewide the MI average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 26045020202
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26045020202?
Census tract 26045020202 in the Lansing-Eaton neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 26045020202?
Median gross rent is $1,045/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 26045020202?
16.0% of residents in tract 26045020202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,681.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 26045020202?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 72th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 94th, minority 72th, housing 45th.
Q5
Is tract 26045020202 considered part of Lansing-Eaton?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26045020202 fall within Lansing-Eaton (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 26045020202?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,154 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 26045020202 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 34.47% of renter households, peaking at 43.0% in 2017. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 26045020202 struggle to pay rent?
About 18.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 26045020202 compare to Lansing overall?
Tract 26045020202 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Lansing at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lansing eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 26045020202 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Lansing
Top eight tracts in Lansing ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · MI
New Neighbors United
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MI
Colonial Village
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MI
Marscot
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MI
Stadium District
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MI
Forest View
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MI
Genesee
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MI
Old Forest
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MI
River Forest
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Related