Within parent city
80
th percentile
High
Census Tract · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally
Walker Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 26081011502 · Kent County, MI · pop 5,788 · 98% of tract blocks fall in Walker
Census tract 26081011502 covers part of Walker, MI, and scores 4.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.2/10.
Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17%
Stable renters 22%
Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units2,313
Renter share39.1%
SVI overall0.57
Poverty rate7.5%
Median income$68,681
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
52
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
56
th percentile
Elevated
National
44
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Walker and the region
Centroid at 43.0106, -85.7042 · click any tract to drill in
Why Walker scores 4.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Walker
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
7.5% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$1,134 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Walker
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Walker
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Walker
4.4
How Walker compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 57
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 32%Socioeconomic
- 52%Household composition
- 29%Racial/ethnic minority
- 91%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 34%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.5%Housing insecurity
- 7.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.1%Food insecurity
- 11.0%SNAP enrollment
- 7.5%Transit barriers
- 7.4%No health insurance
- 17.7%Frequent mental distress
- 28.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Walker
Severe burden reaches 19%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.9/10.
Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.5/10. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
That is riskier than roughly 44% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 6.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
Rent takes 30% or more of income for 43% of renters. It tracks the Kent County average of 4.2 closely. Average gross rent is $1,134, close to the Walker average.
Annual rent works out to 20% of average household income of $68,681.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 26081011502
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26081011502?
Census tract 26081011502 in Walker scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 26081011502?
Median gross rent is $1,134/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 26081011502?
7.5% of residents in tract 26081011502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,788.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 26081011502?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 57th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 32th, household 52th, minority 29th, housing 91th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 26081011502 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 26081011502 compare to Walker overall?
Tract 26081011502 scores 4.1/10, right in line with the parent city of Walker at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Walker eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7
Was tract 26081011502 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Walker
Top eight tracts in Walker ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related