Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #52,479 of 84,120 nationally
Walker Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 26081011702 · Kent County, MI · pop 4,291
Census tract 26081011702 covers part of Walker, MI, and scores 3.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,291 residents. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.2/10.
Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16%
Stable renters 28%
Owners 56%
Tract context
Occupied units1,796
Renter share44.5%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate7.3%
Median income$80,282
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
40
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
48
th percentile
Moderate
National
38
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Walker and the region
Centroid at 42.9435, -85.7568 · click any tract to drill in
Why Walker scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Walker
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
7.3% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,027 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Walker
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Walker
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Walker
4.4
How Walker compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 10
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 21%Socioeconomic
- 3%Household composition
- 27%Racial/ethnic minority
- 31%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.9%Housing insecurity
- 5.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.5%Food insecurity
- 8.3%SNAP enrollment
- 6.5%Transit barriers
- 5.8%No health insurance
- 17.6%Frequent mental distress
- 24.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Walker
On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.8/10. Running cool, supply constraint reads 2.1/10. Against Kent County at 43.7%, 37% of renters here are cost-burdened.
12% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Average gross rent is $1,027, 15% below the Walker average. Food insecurity runs 10.5% against 17.8% nationally.
That is riskier than roughly 38% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.9/10. Rent consumes only 15% of average household income of $80,282, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. It tracks the Kent County average of 4.2 closely.
44% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 26081011702
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26081011702?
Census tract 26081011702 in Walker scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 26081011702?
Median gross rent is $1,027/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 26081011702?
7.3% of residents in tract 26081011702 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,291.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 26081011702?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 3th, minority 27th, housing 31th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 26081011702 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 26081011702 compare to Walker overall?
Tract 26081011702 scores 3.8/10, right in line with the parent city of Walker at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Walker eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Walker
Top eight tracts in Walker ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related