Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #66,742 of 84,120 nationally

Walker Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 26081011702 · Kent County, MI · pop 4,291

The Moderate-tier score of 5.5/10 for census tract 26081011702 reflects conditions in Walker, Michigan. It lands near the 57th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 37% of renter households, a high level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,027 monthly, set against $80,282 in average yearly household income, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 44% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 28% Owners 56%
Tract context
Occupied units1,796
Renter share44.5%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate7.3%
Median income$80,282

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 6 tracts In Walker
Low
Within county
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#105 of 145 tracts In Kent County
Low
Within state
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#2,224 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Low
National
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#66,742 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Walker and the region

Centroid at 42.9435, -85.7568 · click any tract to drill in

Why Walker scores 2.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Walker
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
7.3% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,027 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Walker
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Walker
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Walker
4.4

How Walker compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Walker risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.52.5This tracttract 011702Walker: 2.92.9Walkerparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 10

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Walker

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Walker eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Kent County average of 5.7 and in line with the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 10th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 26081011702

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26081011702?

Census tract 26081011702 in Walker scores 2.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26081011702?

Median gross rent is $1,027/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26081011702?

7.3% of residents in tract 26081011702 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,291.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26081011702?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 3th, minority 27th, housing 31th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 26081011702 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 26081011702 compare to Walker overall?

Tract 26081011702 scores 2.5/10, lower than the parent city of Walker at 2.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Walker eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Walker

Top eight tracts in Walker ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related