Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #44,543 of 84,120 nationally

Wyoming Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 26081013804 · Kent County, MI · pop 4,041

For landlords sizing up Wyoming in Kent County, census tract 26081013804 carries an elevated eviction-risk score of 6.3/10. It lands near the 83rd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 59% of renter households, a severe level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $953 a month against an average household income of $58,886 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 45% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 27% Stable renters 19% Owners 54%
Tract context
Occupied units1,665
Renter share45.1%
SVI overall0.65
Poverty rate16.0%
Median income$58,886

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 18 tracts In Wyoming
High
Within county
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#46 of 145 tracts In Kent County
Elevated
Within state
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#1,288 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Elevated
National
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#44,543 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Wyoming and the region

Centroid at 42.9037, -85.7138 · click any tract to drill in

Why Wyoming scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Wyoming
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
16.0% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$953 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Wyoming
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Wyoming
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Wyoming
6.1

How Wyoming compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Wyoming risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.83.8This tracttract 013804Wyoming: 3.03.0Wyomingparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 65

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Wyoming

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Wyoming eviction laws, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Kent County average of 5.7 and above the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 65th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 17.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 11.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 26081013804

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26081013804?

Census tract 26081013804 in Wyoming scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26081013804?

Median gross rent is $953/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26081013804?

16.0% of residents in tract 26081013804 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,041.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26081013804?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 65th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 62th, minority 62th, housing 76th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 26081013804 struggle to pay rent?

About 17.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 26081013804 compare to Wyoming overall?

Tract 26081013804 scores 3.8/10, higher than the parent city of Wyoming at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Wyoming eviction laws; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 26081013804 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Wyoming

Top eight tracts in Wyoming ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related