Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #31,159 of 84,120 nationally

Roseville Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 26099256700 · Macomb County, MI · pop 1,940

Census tract 26099256700 covers Roseville, home to 1,940 residents. For landlords it grades 6.9/10, an elevated reading. It lands near the 93rd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 54% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,568 a month while the average household earns $50,714 a year, roughly 37% of income at the averages. About 9% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 4% Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units824
Renter share8.7%
SVI overall0.55
Poverty rate23.9%
Median income$50,714

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 19 tracts In Roseville
Very High
Within county
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#20 of 243 tracts In Macomb County
Very High
Within state
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#814 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Elevated
National
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#31,159 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Roseville and the region

Centroid at 42.4839, -82.9520 · click any tract to drill in

Why Roseville scores 4.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Roseville
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
23.9% poverty · this tract
6.0
Supply constraint
$1,568 rent vs county FMR
6.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Roseville
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Roseville
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Roseville
6.3

How Roseville compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Roseville risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.64.6This tracttract 256700Roseville: 3.23.2Rosevilleparent cityCounty: 3.23.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 55

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Roseville

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Roseville eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Macomb County average of 5.5 and above the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 55th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 16.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 12.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 26099256700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26099256700?

Census tract 26099256700 in Roseville scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26099256700?

Median gross rent is $1,568/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26099256700?

23.9% of residents in tract 26099256700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,940.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26099256700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 55th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 74th, household 83th, minority 50th, housing 10th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 26099256700 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 26099256700 compare to Roseville overall?

Tract 26099256700 scores 4.6/10, higher than the parent city of Roseville at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Roseville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 26099256700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Roseville

Top eight tracts in Roseville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related