Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #11,930 of 84,120 nationally

Inkster Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 26163570800 · Wayne County, MI · pop 2,870

Here is how census tract 26163570800, in Inkster eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 7.1/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 2,870. That is riskier than about 96% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 38% of renter households, a high level, and 29% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,090 a month against an average household income of $33,554 a year, roughly 39% of income at the averages. Renters make up 53% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20% Stable renters 33% Owners 47%
Tract context
Occupied units1,214
Renter share53.4%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate31.2%
Median income$33,554

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 8 tracts In Inkster
High
Within county
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#169 of 625 tracts In Wayne County
Elevated
Within state
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#219 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Very High
National
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#11,930 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Inkster and the region

Centroid at 42.2823, -83.3190 · click any tract to drill in

Why Inkster scores 6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Inkster
7.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.9
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
31.2% poverty · this tract
7.8
Supply constraint
$1,090 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Inkster
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Inkster
9.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Inkster
8.7

How Inkster compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Inkster risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.06.0This tracttract 570800Inkster: 3.73.7Inksterparent cityCounty: 4.64.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Inkster

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Inkster eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Wayne County average of 6.4 and above the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 86th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 34.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 29.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 26163570800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26163570800?

Census tract 26163570800 in Inkster scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26163570800?

Median gross rent is $1,090/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26163570800?

31.2% of residents in tract 26163570800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,870.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26163570800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 90th, household 88th, minority 91th, housing 49th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 26163570800 struggle to pay rent?

About 34.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 29.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 26163570800 compare to Inkster overall?

Tract 26163570800 scores 6/10, higher than the parent city of Inkster at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Inkster eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 26163570800 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 99% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Inkster

Top eight tracts in Inkster ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related