Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #58,384 of 84,120 nationally

St. Francis Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 27003050107 · Anoka County, MN · pop 2,931

St. Francis is where census tract 27003050107 sits, home to 2,931 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 4.8/10. On the national scale it ranks #57,410 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 31% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,346 monthly, set against $100,588 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 16% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 11% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,064
Renter share15.8%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate11.3%
Median income$100,588

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In St. Francis
Very High
Within county
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#27 of 90 tracts In Anoka County
Elevated
Within state
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#836 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Moderate
National
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#58,384 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across St. Francis and the region

Centroid at 45.3948, -93.4390 · click any tract to drill in

Why St. Francis scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from St. Francis
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
11.3% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,346 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from St. Francis
3.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from St. Francis
3.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from St. Francis
4.2

How St. Francis compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
St. Francis risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 050107St. Francis: 4.74.7St. Francisparent cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 23

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 39Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 9.47%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.4%Peak (2009)
  • 10Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2012
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270030501072009: 12 filings (8.42/100 renter HHs)2010: 11 filings (13.92/100 renter HHs)2011: 6 filings (5.83/100 renter HHs)2012: 10 filings (9.71/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 17% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in St. Francis

The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 4.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from St. Francis, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Anoka County average of 5.3 and in line with the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 39 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 9.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 8.4% of renter households in 2009.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 23rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27003050107

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27003050107?

Census tract 27003050107 in St. Francis scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27003050107?

Median gross rent is $1,346/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27003050107?

11.3% of residents in tract 27003050107 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,931.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27003050107?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 15th, minority 6th, housing 45th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27003050107?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 39 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 27003050107 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.47% of renter households, peaking at 8.4% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 27003050107 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 27003050107 compare to St. Francis overall?

Tract 27003050107 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of St. Francis at 4.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from St. Francis; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in St. Francis

Top eight tracts in St. Francis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related