Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally

Cari Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Hastings

Tract 27037061105 · Dakota County, MN · pop 2,385 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

For landlords sizing up the Cari Park neighborhood of Hastings, census tract 27037061105 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 4.7/10. On the national scale it ranks #60,073 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 34% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,167 a month against an average household income of $91,607 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 24% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 16% Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units915
Renter share23.6%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate2.2%
Median income$91,607

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Cari Park
Very High
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 7 tracts In Hastings
Elevated
Within county
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#54 of 106 tracts In Dakota County
Moderate
Within state
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#1,184 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Hastings and the region

Centroid at 44.7307, -92.8599 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cari Park scores 1.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Hastings
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
2.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,167 rent vs county FMR
1.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hastings
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hastings
5.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hastings
3.7

How Cari Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cari Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.91.9This tracttract 061105Hastings: 4.84.8Hastingsparent cityCounty: 2.12.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 4

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 62Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 5.39%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.7%Peak (2009)
  • 13Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270370611052009: 18 filings (9.68/100 renter HHs)2010: 12 filings (5.06/100 renter HHs)2011: 10 filings (3.82/100 renter HHs)2012: 9 filings (3.44/100 renter HHs)2013: 13 filings (4.96/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 28% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Cari Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cari Park

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 5.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hastings eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Dakota County average of 5.3 and in line with the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 62 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 5.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 9.7% of renter households in 2009.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27037061105

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27037061105?

Census tract 27037061105 in the Cari Park neighborhood scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27037061105?

Median gross rent is $1,167/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27037061105?

2.2% of residents in tract 27037061105 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,385.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27037061105?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 10th, household 5th, minority 26th, housing 15th.
Q5

Is tract 27037061105 considered part of Cari Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27037061105 fall within Cari Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27037061105?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 62 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27037061105 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.39% of renter households, peaking at 9.7% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 27037061105 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 27037061105 compare to Hastings overall?

Tract 27037061105 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Hastings at 4.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hastings eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Hastings

Top eight tracts in Hastings ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related