Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #79,124 of 84,120 nationally

Cari Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Hastings

Tract 27037061112 · Dakota County, MN · pop 3,307 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

How risky is the Cari Park area of Hastings for landlords? Census tract 27037061112 scores 4.6/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 26% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 29% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,231 a month while the average household earns $115,417 a year, roughly 13% of income at the averages. About 11% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 8% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,283
Renter share11.1%
SVI overall0.02
Poverty rate3.8%
Median income$115,417

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Cari Park
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In Hastings
Very Low
Within county
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#71 of 106 tracts In Dakota County
Low
Within state
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#1,293 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Hastings and the region

Centroid at 44.6945, -92.8626 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cari Park scores 1.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Hastings
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
3.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,231 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hastings
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hastings
5.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hastings
3.7

How Cari Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cari Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.51.5This tracttract 061112Hastings: 4.84.8Hastingsparent cityCounty: 2.12.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 2

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Cari Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cari Park

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 5.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hastings eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Dakota County average of 5.3 and below the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 2nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27037061112

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27037061112?

Census tract 27037061112 in the Cari Park neighborhood scores 1.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27037061112?

Median gross rent is $1,231/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 29% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27037061112?

3.8% of residents in tract 27037061112 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,307.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27037061112?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 2th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 6th, minority 12th, housing 10th.
Q5

Is tract 27037061112 considered part of Cari Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27037061112 fall within Cari Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 27037061112 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 27037061112 compare to Hastings overall?

Tract 27037061112 scores 1.5/10, lower than the parent city of Hastings at 4.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hastings eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Hastings

Top eight tracts in Hastings ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related