Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,836 of 84,120 nationally

Elliot Park Eviction Risk: High , Minneapolis

Tract 27053105400 · Hennepin County, MN · pop 3,781 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Census tract 27053105400 covers part of the Elliot Park area of Minneapolis, MN, and scores 8/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,781 residents. Against the Hennepin County average of 5.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.9 points.

Risk score
8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 33% Stable renters 36% Owners 31%
Tract context
Occupied units2,055
Renter share68.6%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate19.0%
Median income$69,388

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Elliot Park
Very Low
Within parent city
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#46 of 121 tracts In Minneapolis
Elevated
Within county
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 329 tracts In Hennepin County
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Minneapolis and the region

Centroid at 44.9711, -93.2632 · click any tract to drill in

Why Elliot Park scores 8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Minneapolis
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
19.0% poverty · this tract
4.8
Supply constraint
$1,055 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Minneapolis
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Minneapolis
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Minneapolis
7.0

How Elliot Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Elliot Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.08.0This tracttract 105400Minneapolis: 6.66.6Minneapolisparent cityCounty: 5.15.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 196Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 3.07%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.8%Peak (2009)
  • 28Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270531054002009: 45 filings (3.76/100 renter HHs)2010: 45 filings (3.54/100 renter HHs)2011: 37 filings (2.82/100 renter HHs)2012: 41 filings (3.12/100 renter HHs)2013: 28 filings (2.13/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 38% over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 595Total filings 2020-21
  • 7.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 2.73×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2020-02-01: 3 filings (1.04× baseline)2020-03-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (0.69× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.35× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.53× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (0.65× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.35× baseline)2022-03-01: 12 filings (4.36× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2022-05-01: 9 filings (3.13× baseline)2022-06-01: 12 filings (6.38× baseline)2022-07-01: 14 filings (3.03× baseline)2022-08-01: 9 filings (2.49× baseline)2022-09-01: 7 filings (2.67× baseline)2022-10-01: 8 filings (2.67× baseline)2022-11-01: 11 filings (3.25× baseline)2022-12-01: 26 filings (6.93× baseline)2023-01-01: 20 filings (5.71× baseline)2023-02-01: 15 filings (5.21× baseline)2023-03-01: 11 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 10 filings (6.67× baseline)2023-05-01: 10 filings (3.47× baseline)2023-06-01: 8 filings (4.26× baseline)2023-07-01: 9 filings (1.95× baseline)2023-08-01: 8 filings (2.21× baseline)2023-09-01: 7 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-10-01: 14 filings (4.67× baseline)2023-11-01: 6 filings (1.78× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-01-01: 10 filings (2.86× baseline)2024-02-01: 9 filings (3.13× baseline)2024-03-01: 10 filings (3.64× baseline)2024-04-01: 17 filings (11.33× baseline)2024-05-01: 14 filings (4.86× baseline)2024-06-01: 18 filings (9.57× baseline)2024-07-01: 10 filings (2.16× baseline)2024-08-01: 12 filings (3.31× baseline)2024-09-01: 6 filings (2.29× baseline)2024-10-01: 23 filings (7.67× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-12-01: 19 filings (5.07× baseline)2025-01-01: 13 filings (3.71× baseline)2025-02-01: 24 filings (8.33× baseline)2025-03-01: 12 filings (4.36× baseline)2025-04-01: 18 filings (12.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 6 filings (2.08× baseline)2025-06-01: 10 filings (5.32× baseline)2025-07-01: 8 filings (1.73× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.28× baseline)2025-09-01: 19 filings (7.25× baseline)2025-10-01: 12 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 4 filings (1.18× baseline)2025-12-01: 18 filings (4.80× baseline)2026-01-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Elliot Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Elliot Park

The severe-burden share is 29%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. What pushes it up most is local political climate at 9/10.

Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.3/10. 69% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.5/10.

Average gross rent is $1,055, 23% below the Minneapolis average. The poverty rate is 19%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Court records carry 196 eviction filings across 5 observed years. Against Hennepin County at 43.1%, 47% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Filings peaked in 2009 at 3.8% of renter households. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Minneapolis. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

In a typical year about 3.1% of renter households face a filing.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 27053105400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053105400?

Census tract 27053105400 in the Elliot Park neighborhood scores 8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27053105400?

Median gross rent is $1,055/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27053105400?

19.0% of residents in tract 27053105400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,781.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27053105400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 75th, household 27th, minority 57th, housing 100th.
Q5

Is tract 27053105400 considered part of Elliot Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27053105400 fall within Elliot Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27053105400?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 196 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27053105400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.07% of renter households, peaking at 3.8% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 27053105400 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 2.73× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 27053105400 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 27053105400 compare to Minneapolis overall?

Tract 27053105400 scores 8/10, higher than the parent city of Minneapolis at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Minneapolis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 27053105400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 81% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Minneapolis

Top eight tracts in Minneapolis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related