Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,836 of 84,120 nationally

Loring Park Eviction Risk: High , Minneapolis

Tract 27053105204 · Hennepin County, MN · pop 2,738 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Tract 27053105204 sits in the Loring Park area of Minneapolis eviction risk, MN, carrying an eviction-risk score of 8/10. Population here is 2,738. Against the Hennepin County average of 5.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.9 points.

Risk score
8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 43% Stable renters 44% Owners 13%
Tract context
Occupied units2,129
Renter share87.5%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate17.8%
Median income$51,547

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Loring Park
Very High
Within parent city
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#19 of 121 tracts In Minneapolis
High
Within county
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 329 tracts In Hennepin County
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Minneapolis and the region

Centroid at 44.9690, -93.2756 · click any tract to drill in

Why Loring Park scores 8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Minneapolis
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
17.8% poverty · this tract
4.4
Supply constraint
$1,244 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Minneapolis
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Minneapolis
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Minneapolis
7.0

How Loring Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Loring Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.08.0This tracttract 105204Minneapolis: 6.66.6Minneapolisparent cityCounty: 5.15.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 230Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 2.91%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.1%Peak (2010)
  • 34Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270531052042009: 46 filings (2.46/100 renter HHs)2010: 61 filings (4.09/100 renter HHs)2011: 41 filings (2.67/100 renter HHs)2012: 48 filings (3.13/100 renter HHs)2013: 34 filings (2.22/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 26% over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 771Total filings 2020-21
  • 10.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 3.11×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (0.74× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (0.69× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.26× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (0.69× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.47× baseline)2021-09-01: 4 filings (2.29× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (0.59× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-12-01: 5 filings (1.29× baseline)2022-01-01: 5 filings (0.93× baseline)2022-02-01: 4 filings (1.39× baseline)2022-03-01: 11 filings (4.62× baseline)2022-04-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 9 filings (2.32× baseline)2022-06-01: 23 filings (7.99× baseline)2022-07-01: 34 filings (11.33× baseline)2022-08-01: 11 filings (2.59× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (3.43× baseline)2022-10-01: 10 filings (1.95× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (1.29× baseline)2023-01-01: 19 filings (3.53× baseline)2023-02-01: 6 filings (2.08× baseline)2023-03-01: 30 filings (12.61× baseline)2023-04-01: 11 filings (3.67× baseline)2023-05-01: 25 filings (6.44× baseline)2023-06-01: 16 filings (5.56× baseline)2023-07-01: 14 filings (4.67× baseline)2023-08-01: 15 filings (3.53× baseline)2023-09-01: 15 filings (8.57× baseline)2023-10-01: 12 filings (2.34× baseline)2023-11-01: 10 filings (3.33× baseline)2023-12-01: 14 filings (3.61× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (0.37× baseline)2024-02-01: 14 filings (4.86× baseline)2024-03-01: 10 filings (4.20× baseline)2024-04-01: 20 filings (6.67× baseline)2024-05-01: 15 filings (3.87× baseline)2024-06-01: 10 filings (3.47× baseline)2024-07-01: 17 filings (5.67× baseline)2024-08-01: 19 filings (4.47× baseline)2024-09-01: 11 filings (6.29× baseline)2024-10-01: 14 filings (2.73× baseline)2024-11-01: 17 filings (5.67× baseline)2024-12-01: 31 filings (7.99× baseline)2025-01-01: 27 filings (5.02× baseline)2025-02-01: 6 filings (2.08× baseline)2025-03-01: 20 filings (8.40× baseline)2025-04-01: 11 filings (3.67× baseline)2025-05-01: 6 filings (1.55× baseline)2025-06-01: 7 filings (2.43× baseline)2025-07-01: 12 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 19 filings (4.47× baseline)2025-09-01: 19 filings (10.86× baseline)2025-10-01: 18 filings (3.52× baseline)2025-11-01: 15 filings (5.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 16 filings (4.12× baseline)2026-01-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Loring Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Loring Park

The score leans hardest on local political climate at 9/10. 87% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.5/10. 16% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.4/10.

Cost burden runs 49% here against 43.1% across Hennepin County. Court records carry 230 eviction filings across 5 observed years. Average gross rent is $1,244, 9% below the Minneapolis average.

Filings peaked in 2010 at 4.1% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

In a typical year about 2.9% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 91st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 27053105204

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053105204?

Census tract 27053105204 in the Loring Park neighborhood scores 8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27053105204?

Median gross rent is $1,244/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27053105204?

17.8% of residents in tract 27053105204 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,738.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27053105204?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 47th, household 12th, minority 49th, housing 53th.
Q5

Is tract 27053105204 considered part of Loring Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27053105204 fall within Loring Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27053105204?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 230 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27053105204 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.91% of renter households, peaking at 4.1% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 27053105204 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 3.11× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 27053105204 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 27053105204 compare to Minneapolis overall?

Tract 27053105204 scores 8/10, higher than the parent city of Minneapolis at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Minneapolis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 27053105204 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 45% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Minneapolis

Top eight tracts in Minneapolis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related