Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,836 of 84,120 nationally

Jordan Eviction Risk: High , Minneapolis

Tract 27053101300 · Hennepin County, MN · pop 2,049 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

With a score of 8/10, tract 27053101300 in the Jordan area of Minneapolis, MN reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,049. Cost burden runs 65% here against 43.1% across Hennepin County.

Risk score
8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 34% Stable renters 18% Owners 48%
Tract context
Occupied units815
Renter share52.5%
SVI overall0.98
Poverty rate31.1%
Median income$56,734

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Jordan
Very High
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#41 of 121 tracts In Minneapolis
Elevated
Within county
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#36 of 329 tracts In Hennepin County
High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Minneapolis and the region

Centroid at 45.0099, -93.3118 · click any tract to drill in

Why Jordan scores 8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Minneapolis
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
31.1% poverty · this tract
7.8
Supply constraint
$892 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Minneapolis
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Minneapolis
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Minneapolis
7.0

How Jordan compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Jordan risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.08.0This tracttract 101300Minneapolis: 6.66.6Minneapolisparent cityCounty: 5.15.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 98

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 203Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 14.01%Avg annual filing rate
  • 13.3%Peak (2013)
  • 46Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270531013002009: 37 filings (17.79/100 renter HHs)2010: 42 filings (16.34/100 renter HHs)2011: 39 filings (11.30/100 renter HHs)2012: 39 filings (11.30/100 renter HHs)2013: 46 filings (13.33/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 24% over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 146Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.58×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (1.03× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.32× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.32× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.52× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.32× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (0.55× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (0.52× baseline)2022-02-01: 5 filings (1.54× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.32× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (0.39× baseline)2022-06-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.52× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (0.64× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (1.10× baseline)2022-12-01: 9 filings (2.49× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.26× baseline)2023-02-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (0.64× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.32× baseline)2023-05-01: 5 filings (0.98× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2023-07-01: 8 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (0.52× baseline)2023-09-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (0.64× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.28× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (0.83× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (0.64× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (0.39× baseline)2024-06-01: 7 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (0.52× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (0.96× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 4 filings (1.10× baseline)2025-01-01: 4 filings (1.03× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (0.64× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-07-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.52× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (1.28× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Jordan. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Jordan

Against the Hennepin County average of 5.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.9 points. 34% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Food insecurity runs 41.3% against 17.8% nationally.

The score leans hardest on local political climate at 9/10. Average gross rent is $892, 35% below the Minneapolis average. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10.

The poverty rate is 31%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.5/10.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 21.5% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. The filing record is not thin: 203 evictions over 5 years of observation. The worst year on record was 2013, when 13.3% of renter households were served.

This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Minneapolis. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 14.0% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 91% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 27053101300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053101300?

Census tract 27053101300 in the Jordan neighborhood scores 8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27053101300?

Median gross rent is $892/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27053101300?

31.1% of residents in tract 27053101300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,049.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27053101300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 98th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 84th, household 100th, minority 88th, housing 93th.
Q5

Is tract 27053101300 considered part of Jordan?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27053101300 fall within Jordan (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27053101300?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 203 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27053101300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.01% of renter households, peaking at 13.3% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 27053101300 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.58× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 27053101300 struggle to pay rent?

About 30.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 21.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 27053101300 compare to Minneapolis overall?

Tract 27053101300 scores 8/10, higher than the parent city of Minneapolis at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Minneapolis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 27053101300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Minneapolis

Top eight tracts in Minneapolis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related