Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #61,757 of 84,120 nationally

Mound Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 27053027601 · Hennepin County, MN · pop 4,167

Census tract 27053027601 covers Mound, home to 4,167 residents. For landlords it grades 4.9/10, a moderate reading. It lands near the 35th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 43% of renter households, a severe level, and 27% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,089 monthly, set against $98,750 in average yearly household income, roughly 13% of income at the averages. Renters make up 30% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 17% Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units1,931
Renter share30.0%
SVI overall0.25
Poverty rate10.2%
Median income$98,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Mound
Very Low
Within county
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#193 of 329 tracts In Hennepin County
Moderate
Within state
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#884 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Moderate
National
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#61,757 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mound and the region

Centroid at 44.9459, -93.6590 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mound scores 2.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mound
5.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
10.2% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,089 rent vs county FMR
1.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mound
4.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mound
5.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mound
4.4

How Mound compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mound risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.82.8This tracttract 027601Mound: 4.84.8Moundparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 25

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 85Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 4.03%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.9%Peak (2009)
  • 14Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270530276012009: 25 filings (6.94/100 renter HHs)2010: 16 filings (4.02/100 renter HHs)2011: 5 filings (1.05/100 renter HHs)2012: 25 filings (5.23/100 renter HHs)2013: 14 filings (2.93/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 44% over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 59Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.85×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (1.14× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 3 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (3.41× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-02-01: 5 filings (5.68× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (4.84× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (4.55× baseline)2023-09-01: 3 filings (2.17× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 4 filings (4.55× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.72× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mound

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 5.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Mound, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hennepin County average of 5.6 and in line with the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 85 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 4.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 6.9% of renter households in 2009.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 25th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27053027601

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053027601?

Census tract 27053027601 in Mound scores 2.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27053027601?

Median gross rent is $1,089/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27053027601?

10.2% of residents in tract 27053027601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,167.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27053027601?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 25th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 29th, minority 24th, housing 60th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27053027601?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 85 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27053027601 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.03% of renter households, peaking at 6.9% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 27053027601 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.85× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 27053027601 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 27053027601 compare to Mound overall?

Tract 27053027601 scores 2.8/10, lower than the parent city of Mound at 4.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mound; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mound

Top eight tracts in Mound ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related