Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #41,206 of 84,120 nationally

Crystal Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 27053020801 · Hennepin County, MN · pop 1,973 · 97% of tract blocks fall in Crystal

Census tract 27053020801 covers part of Crystal, MN, and scores 4.5/10 on landlord eviction risk. Cost burden runs 56% here against 43.1% across Hennepin County.

Risk score
4.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 6% Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units886
Renter share13.2%
SVI overall0.36
Poverty rate7.8%
Median income$78,462

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 7 tracts In Crystal
High
Within county
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#177 of 329 tracts In Hennepin County
Moderate
Within state
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#589 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Elevated
National
51 th percentile
Rank, 51st percentileLowHigh
#41,206 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Crystal and the region

Centroid at 45.0589, -93.3697 · click any tract to drill in

Why Crystal scores 4.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Crystal
7.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
7.8% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$1,228 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Crystal
8.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Crystal
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Crystal
6.6

How Crystal compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Crystal risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.5This tracttract 0208014.2Crystalparent city5.1Countyavg tract in county4.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 36

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 59Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 6.39%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.9%Peak (2009)
  • 11Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 27053020801
Filings dropped 31% over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 26Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.63×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Crystal

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 8.8/10. The severe-burden share is 21%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

On the softer side, economic stress reads 2/10. Running cool, supply constraint reads 2.3/10.

Average gross rent is $1,228, 16% below the Crystal average. The filing record is not thin: 59 evictions over 5 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2009 at 7.9% of renter households.

In a typical year about 6.4% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 51st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 13% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

Social vulnerability reads 4.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. It tracks the Hennepin County average of 5.1 closely.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 27053020801

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053020801?

Census tract 27053020801 in Crystal scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27053020801?

Median gross rent is $1,228/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27053020801?

7.8% of residents in tract 27053020801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,973.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27053020801?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 42th, minority 39th, housing 46th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27053020801?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 59 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27053020801 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.39% of renter households, peaking at 7.9% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 27053020801 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.63× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 27053020801 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 27053020801 compare to Crystal overall?

Tract 27053020801 scores 4.5/10, higher than the parent city of Crystal at 4.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Crystal eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Crystal

Top eight tracts in Crystal ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related