Census Tract · Ranked #61,757 of 84,120 nationally
Crystal Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 27053020801 ·
Hennepin County, MN · pop 1,973 · 97% of tract blocks fall in Crystal
Census tract 27053020801 runs through Crystal in Hennepin County. With 1,973 residents, it scores 5.8/10 for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 68% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 56% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,228 a month while the average household earns $78,462 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 13% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%Stable renters 6%Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units886
Renter share13.2%
SVI overall0.36
Poverty rate7.8%
Median income$78,462
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
67th percentile
#3 of 7 tracts In Crystal
Elevated
Within county
40th percentile
#197 of 329 tracts In Hennepin County
Moderate
Within state
41th percentile
#884 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Moderate
National
27th percentile
#61,757 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Crystal and the region
Centroid at 45.0589, -93.3697 · click any tract to drill in
Why Crystal scores 2.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Crystal
7.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
7.8% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$1,228 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Crystal
8.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Crystal
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Crystal
6.6
How Crystal compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 36
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
31%Socioeconomic
42%Household composition
39%Racial/ethnic minority
46%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
59Total filings over 5 yrs
6.39%Avg annual filing rate
7.9%Peak (2009)
11Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year2009 to 2013
Filings dropped 31% over the past 5 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
26Total filings 2020-21
0.3Avg monthly (observed)
0.5Pre-pandemic baseline
0.63×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
11.8%Housing insecurity
6.5%Utility-shutoff threat
13.3%Food insecurity
8.7%SNAP enrollment
8.1%Transit barriers
9.2%No health insurance
16.5%Frequent mental distress
27.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Crystal
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Crystal eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Hennepin County average of 5.6 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 59 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 6.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 7.9% of renter households in 2009.
During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.63x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 27053020801
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053020801?
Census tract 27053020801 in Crystal scores 2.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 27053020801?
Median gross rent is $1,228/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 27053020801?
7.8% of residents in tract 27053020801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,973.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 27053020801?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 42th, minority 39th, housing 46th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27053020801?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 59 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27053020801 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.39% of renter households, peaking at 7.9% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
Did eviction filings in tract 27053020801 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.63× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q7
What share of households in tract 27053020801 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 27053020801 compare to Crystal overall?
Tract 27053020801 scores 2.8/10, lower than the parent city of Crystal at 5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Crystal eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Crystal
Top eight tracts in Crystal ranked by composite eviction-risk score.