Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #83,884 of 84,120 nationally

Hugo Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 27163070204 · Washington County, MN · pop 6,285

Census tract 27163070204 belongs to Hugo, Minnesota. It is home to 6,285 residents and scores 4.9/10, a moderate reading for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #54,661 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 31% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,929 a month against an average household income of $133,145 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. Renters make up 6% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 4% Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units2,670
Renter share6.1%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate2.2%
Median income$133,145

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Hugo
Very Low
Within county
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#59 of 59 tracts In Washington County
Very Low
Within state
1 th percentile
Rank, 1st percentileLowHigh
#1,489 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Very Low
National
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#83,884 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Hugo and the region

Centroid at 45.1354, -92.9641 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hugo scores 1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Hugo
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
2.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,929 rent vs county FMR
6.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hugo
7.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hugo
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hugo
4.8

How Hugo compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hugo risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.01.0This tracttract 070204Hugo: 4.84.8Hugoparent cityCounty: 1.81.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 3

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 27Total filings over 3 yrs
  • 5.89%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.9%Peak (2012)
  • 12Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2012
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 271630702042010: 7 filings (6.25/100 renter HHs)2011: 8 filings (4.57/100 renter HHs)2012: 12 filings (6.86/100 renter HHs)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hugo

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 7.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hugo, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Washington County average of 5.1 and in line with the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 3rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27163070204

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27163070204?

Census tract 27163070204 in Hugo scores 1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27163070204?

Median gross rent is $1,929/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27163070204?

2.2% of residents in tract 27163070204 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,285.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27163070204?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 12th, minority 15th, housing 16th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27163070204?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 27 eviction filings across 3 validated years in tract 27163070204 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.89% of renter households, peaking at 6.9% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 27163070204 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 27163070204 compare to Hugo overall?

Tract 27163070204 scores 1/10, lower than the parent city of Hugo at 4.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hugo; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Hugo

Top eight tracts in Hugo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related