Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally

Kansas City Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 29095017500 · Jackson County, MO · pop 2,146

With a score of 5.4/10, tract 29095017500 in Kansas City, MO reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1.5/10.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 21% Owners 62%
Tract context
Occupied units920
Renter share37.5%
SVI overall0.62
Poverty rate30.9%
Median income$46,548

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#34 of 163 tracts In Kansas City
High
Within county
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#47 of 227 tracts In Jackson County
High
Within state
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#68 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Very High
National
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#24,859 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kansas City and the region

Centroid at 39.0129, -94.5054 · click any tract to drill in

Why Kansas City scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Kansas City
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
30.9% poverty · this tract
7.7
Supply constraint
$929 rent vs county FMR
1.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kansas City
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kansas City
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kansas City
4.0

How Kansas City compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Kansas City risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.45.4This tracttract 017500Kansas City: 4.04.0Kansas Cityparent cityCounty: 4.24.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 62

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 580Total filings over 14 yrs
  • 16.56%Avg annual filing rate
  • 25.1%Peak (2012)
  • 29Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 290950175002003: 25 filings (7.74/100 renter HHs)2004: 10 filings (3.10/100 renter HHs)2005: 22 filings (12.09/100 renter HHs)2006: 14 filings (7.69/100 renter HHs)2007: 41 filings (22.53/100 renter HHs)2008: 64 filings (35.16/100 renter HHs)2009: 33 filings (18.13/100 renter HHs)2010: 38 filings (14.29/100 renter HHs)2011: 57 filings (19.32/100 renter HHs)2012: 74 filings (25.08/100 renter HHs)2013: 67 filings (22.71/100 renter HHs)2014: 52 filings (17.63/100 renter HHs)2015: 54 filings (18.31/100 renter HHs)2017: 29 filings (7.99/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 16% over the past 14 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 126Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.36×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.28× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2022-02-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 8 filings (1.60× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.28× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (0.84× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2023-09-01: 8 filings (1.68× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 12 filings (2.09× baseline)2024-01-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (0.65× baseline)2024-08-01: 10 filings (1.38× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 6 filings (1.41× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 9 filings (3.27× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Kansas City, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Kansas City

The severe-burden share is 23%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The poverty rate is 31%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10.

Average gross rent is $929, 25% below the Kansas City average. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.9/10.

It sits 1.2 points above the Jackson County average of 4.2. The filing record is not thin: 580 evictions over 14 years of observation.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 16.7% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Housing insecurity runs 21.2% against 14.2% nationally. Filings peaked in 2012 at 25.1% of renter households.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 29095017500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29095017500?

Census tract 29095017500 in Kansas City scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29095017500?

Median gross rent is $929/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29095017500?

30.9% of residents in tract 29095017500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,146.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29095017500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 62th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 70th, household 20th, minority 76th, housing 62th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29095017500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 580 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 29095017500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 16.56% of renter households, peaking at 25.1% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 29095017500 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.36× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Kansas City eviction risk, MO), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 29095017500 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 29095017500 compare to Kansas City overall?

Tract 29095017500 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Kansas City at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kansas City eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 29095017500 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Kansas City

Top eight tracts in Kansas City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related