Custer County, Nebraska Eviction Risk: Low
9 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Broken Bow (3.1) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.
Ranked #21 of 93 NE counties
6k residents · 9 cities · 4 tracts
Custer County eviction risk score history
Key metrics
-
Tenant beats landlord15.6%/ 100 outcomesIn court-decided eviction outcomes for Custer County, NE, tenants prevail in roughly 15.6% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses and longer calendars.
-
Timeline29dfiling → judgmentFrom the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Custer County, NE until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 29 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent for landlords.
-
Cost range$1.0–3.3klegal + lost rentA typical eviction in Custer County, NE costs landlords $993 to $3,274 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent.
-
Average rent$84925% stretched on rentAverage gross rent in Custer County, NE is $849 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey. 25% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent.
-
Renters37.3%of households37.3% of occupied housing units in Custer County, NE are renter-occupied. A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings and a more active rental market.
-
Poverty12.8%4.7% unemp.12.8% of Custer County, NE residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 4.7%. Both feed the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model.
Scrub 50 years
Custer County's 2.7/10 (Low) average spans a narrow 2.3-3.1 range across 9 cities, characteristic of a low-density rural county where rental market conditions are consistent from town to town. Ranked 21st of 93 Nebraska counties - higher-risk by eviction risk, with 20 counties carrying higher risk statewide.
How Custer County ranks in Nebraska
Landlord guides for Nebraska
| City↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | % income on rent↕ | Average rent↕ | Lean↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Broken Bow | 3,502 | 2.8 | 25.0% | $876 | Rep |
| 002 | Ansley | 563 | 2.6 | 18.4% | $1,034 | Rep |
| 003 | Callaway | 562 | 2.5 | 19.3% | $631 | Rep |
| 004 | Sargent | 534 | 2.5 | 22.6% | $631 | Rep |
| 005 | Merna | 383 | 2.6 | 43.1% | $983 | Rep |
| 006 | Oconto | 167 | 3.1 | 33.1% | $875 | Rep |
| 007 | Anselmo | 93 | 2.3 | 46.3% | $658 | Rep |
| 008 | Berwyn | 51 | 2.4 | 25.6% | $871 | Rep |
| 009 | Westerville | 19 | 2.5 | 25.6% | $871 | Rep |
County heatmap
One county, multiple regulatory regimes.
Custer County sits in the geographic heart of Nebraska, covering more than 2,500 square miles of Sandhills ranch land and small agricultural communities. With a total renter population spread across 9 incorporated places and roughly 5,874 residents, the rental market here is thin by urban standards - about 37.3% of households rent, paying an average of $849 per month, and the average rent burden lands at 25.4% of income. That affordability cushion is the single biggest driver keeping the county's eviction risk at 2.7/10 (Low), placing Custer 21st of 93 Nebraska counties - in the higher-risk of the state, with 20 counties carrying higher risk and 72 carrying lower risk.
Risk is not uniform across the county. Scores run from 2.3 in Anselmo - a hamlet of 93 residents where the rental stock is tiny and disputes rarely reach the courthouse - up to 3.1 in Oconto (3.1/10), a small community of about 167 people where a higher share of income goes to rent relative to local wages. The county seat and largest city, Broken Bow (pop. 3,502), scores 2.8/10, reflecting its status as the commercial hub where most of the county's rental units are concentrated and where the handful of annual eviction filings actually get heard in Custer County District Court. Ansley (2.6/10, pop. 563), Callaway (2.5/10, pop. 562), and Sargent (2.5/10, pop. 534) are similar in size and risk profile - small enough that a single contested eviction can move local averages noticeably from year to year. Poverty runs at 12.8% countywide, below the Nebraska rural average, which contributes to the relatively stable payment history the county's landlords report.
Nebraska's landlord-tenant framework (Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-1401 et seq.) applies uniformly statewide, and Custer County offers no local overlay - no rent control, no just-cause eviction requirement, and no source-of-income protection. Landlords must give 7 days' written notice for non-payment of rent before filing, 14 days for a curable lease violation, and 30 days for a no-cause termination at the end of a lease term. Court filing fees at the Custer County Courthouse run $85-$200 depending on claim amount, sheriff lockout fees range $40-$150, and uncontested cases typically resolve in 21-45 days. Contested proceedings can stretch 45-100 days, which is the primary cost risk in a county where rental income is modest and carrying costs on a vacant unit during litigation add up quickly.
Custer County's 2.7/10 (Low) average reflects a rural rental market defined by low density, moderate poverty, and a pro-landlord state statute with no local override. The spread from 2.3 to 3.1 across 9 cities is narrow by Nebraska eviction laws standards, meaning landlord experience varies less by location here than in counties anchored by larger cities.
Historical eviction filings in Custer County
From 2000 to 2016, eviction filings in Custer County increased 400%. The peak was 10 filings in 2014.1
- 12000
- 10Peak (2014)
- 52016
Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.
How Custer County compares
At 2.7/10 (Low) and ranked 21st of 93, Custer County sits above Nebraska's statewide average of 2.9/10 but remains well within the Low tier. Its closest peers - Richardson, Dawes, Burt, Butler, and Knox counties - all score at nearly identical levels, confirming that Custer's profile is typical for a mid-sized Nebraska rural county without a major population center. The higher-risk placement reflects the modest rent burden and poverty figures rather than any structural legal disadvantage for landlords.