Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally
Aksarben Eviction Risk: Lower , Omaha
Tract 31055003600 · Douglas County, NE · pop 3,976 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
With a score of 3.2/10, tract 31055003600 in the Aksarben area of Omaha, NE reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,976. Cost burden runs 27% here against 44.0% across Douglas County.
Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%
Stable renters 22%
Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units1,978
Renter share30.3%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate6.5%
Median income$86,104
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
39
th percentile
Low
Within county
39
th percentile
Low
Within state
45
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Omaha and the region
Centroid at 41.2442, -96.0016 · click any tract to drill in
Why Aksarben scores 3.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Omaha
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
6.5% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$1,466 rent vs county FMR
6.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Omaha
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Omaha
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Omaha
3.0
How Aksarben compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 3
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 10%Socioeconomic
- 9%Household composition
- 22%Racial/ethnic minority
- 7%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 100%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 204Total filings over 13 yrs
- 3.25%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.3%Peak (2005)
- 9Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 44% over the past 13 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Aksarben. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.1%Housing insecurity
- 4.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.8%Food insecurity
- 4.9%SNAP enrollment
- 5.0%Transit barriers
- 6.9%No health insurance
- 13.8%Frequent mental distress
- 21.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Aksarben
The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.6/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.8/10.
Average gross rent is $1,466, 24% above the Omaha average. SNAP participation runs 4.9% against 15.2% nationally.
The severe-burden share is 11%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The voucher gap is 16.3%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 204 filings here across 13 tracked years. Housing insecurity runs 7.1% against 14.2% nationally. It sits 0.7 points below the Douglas County average of 3.9.
Filings peaked in 2005 at 5.3% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 3.3% of renter households face a filing.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 31055003600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31055003600?
Census tract 31055003600 in the Aksarben neighborhood scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 31055003600?
Median gross rent is $1,466/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 27% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 31055003600?
6.5% of residents in tract 31055003600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,976.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 31055003600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 10th, household 9th, minority 22th, housing 7th.
Q5
Is tract 31055003600 considered part of Aksarben?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 31055003600 fall within Aksarben (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31055003600?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 204 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 31055003600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.25% of renter households, peaking at 5.3% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 31055003600 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 31055003600 compare to Omaha overall?
Tract 31055003600 scores 3.2/10, lower than the parent city of Omaha at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Omaha eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 31055003600 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Omaha
Top eight tracts in Omaha ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · NE
Aksarben Village
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
31055003401
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Blackstone
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
The Old Market
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Blackstone
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
The Old Market
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
31055005300
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
The Old Market
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Related