Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #59,654 of 84,120 nationally

Aksarben Eviction Risk: Lower , Omaha

Tract 31055007002 · Douglas County, NE · pop 3,683 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Tract 31055007002 sits in the Aksarben area of Omaha eviction risk, NE, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.4/10. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 21% Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units1,491
Renter share31.0%
SVI overall0.45
Poverty rate5.2%
Median income$73,933

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Aksarben
Moderate
Within parent city
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#88 of 157 tracts In Omaha
Moderate
Within county
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#91 of 163 tracts In Douglas County
Moderate
Within state
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#266 of 553 tracts In Nebraska
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Omaha and the region

Centroid at 41.2266, -95.9908 · click any tract to drill in

Why Aksarben scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Omaha
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
5.2% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$1,151 rent vs county FMR
4.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Omaha
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Omaha
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Omaha
3.0

How Aksarben compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Aksarben risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.4This tracttract 0070023.7Omahaparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county3.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 45

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 192Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 3.58%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.9%Peak (2007)
  • 10Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 31055007002
Filings climbed 25% over the past 13 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Aksarben. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Aksarben

Against Douglas County at 44.0%, 32% of renters here are cost-burdened. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.3/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.8/10.

Court records carry 192 eviction filings across 13 observed years. Filings peaked in 2007 at 4.9% of renter households.

This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Omaha. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 3.6% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #59,654 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. It tracks the Douglas County average of 3.9 closely.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 31055007002

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31055007002?

Census tract 31055007002 in the Aksarben neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 31055007002?

Median gross rent is $1,151/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 31055007002?

5.2% of residents in tract 31055007002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,683.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 31055007002?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 45th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 67th, minority 49th, housing 34th.
Q5

Is tract 31055007002 considered part of Aksarben?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 31055007002 fall within Aksarben (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31055007002?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 192 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 31055007002 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.58% of renter households, peaking at 4.9% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 31055007002 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 31055007002 compare to Omaha overall?

Tract 31055007002 scores 3.4/10, lower than the parent city of Omaha at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Omaha eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 31055007002 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Omaha

Top eight tracts in Omaha ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related