Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally
Aksarben Eviction Risk: Lower , Omaha
Tract 31055007002 · Douglas County, NE · pop 3,683 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi
Tract 31055007002, home to 3,683 residents in Aksarben in Omaha, scores 4.3/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 18% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 32% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 4% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,151 a month against an average household income of $73,933 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 31% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%
Stable renters 21%
Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units1,491
Renter share31.0%
SVI overall0.45
Poverty rate5.2%
Median income$73,933
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
42
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
43
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
52
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Omaha and the region
Centroid at 41.2266, -95.9908 · click any tract to drill in
Why Aksarben scores 3.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Omaha
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
5.2% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$1,151 rent vs county FMR
4.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Omaha
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Omaha
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Omaha
3.0
How Aksarben compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 45
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 41%Socioeconomic
- 67%Household composition
- 49%Racial/ethnic minority
- 34%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 100%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 192Total filings over 13 yrs
- 3.58%Avg annual filing rate
- 4.9%Peak (2007)
- 10Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 25% over the past 13 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Aksarben. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.0%Housing insecurity
- 6.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.6%Food insecurity
- 8.3%SNAP enrollment
- 6.8%Transit barriers
- 11.5%No health insurance
- 14.4%Frequent mental distress
- 27.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Aksarben
What moves this score most is supply constraint at 4.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Omaha eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Douglas County average of 4.8 and above the Nebraska statewide average of 3.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 45th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 31055007002
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31055007002?
Census tract 31055007002 in the Aksarben neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 31055007002?
Median gross rent is $1,151/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 31055007002?
5.2% of residents in tract 31055007002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,683.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 31055007002?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 45th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 67th, minority 49th, housing 34th.
Q5
Is tract 31055007002 considered part of Aksarben?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 31055007002 fall within Aksarben (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31055007002?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 192 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 31055007002 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.58% of renter households, peaking at 4.9% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 31055007002 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 31055007002 compare to Omaha overall?
Tract 31055007002 scores 3.3/10, right in line with the parent city of Omaha at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Omaha eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 31055007002 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Omaha
Top eight tracts in Omaha ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · NE
NoDo
6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NE
NoDo
6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NE
Beechwood
5.9
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NE
Beechwood
5.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NE
31055005300
5.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NE
South Omaha
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NE
31055006101
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NE
Dundee
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Related