Aksarben Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Omaha
Tract 31055007001 · Douglas County, NE · pop 5,283 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
Tract 31055007001 sits in the Aksarben Village area of Omaha eviction risk, NE, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.1/10. It is home to 5,283 residents. The severe-burden share is 28%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Omaha and the region
Centroid at 41.2297, -96.0124 · click any tract to drill in
Why Aksarben Village scores 5.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Aksarben Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 86
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 73%Socioeconomic
- 54%Household composition
- 53%Racial/ethnic minority
- 99%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 34%Grade A
- 66%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 634Total filings over 13 yrs
- 3.91%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.3%Peak (2004)
- 44Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Aksarben Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.3%Housing insecurity
- 7.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 15.1%Food insecurity
- 9.5%SNAP enrollment
- 8.9%Transit barriers
- 11.3%No health insurance
- 17.8%Frequent mental distress
- 26.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Aksarben Village
The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. 82% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.8/10.
It sits 1.2 points above the Douglas County average of 3.9. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.5/10. The poverty rate is 18%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
The filing record is not thin: 634 evictions over 13 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2004 at 5.3% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 3.9% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 63% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.7/10.
Statewide the NE average is 3.7, so this tract runs 1.4 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 31055007001
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31055007001?
What is the average rent in tract 31055007001?
What is the poverty rate in tract 31055007001?
How socially vulnerable is tract 31055007001?
Is tract 31055007001 considered part of Aksarben Village?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31055007001?
What share of households in tract 31055007001 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 31055007001 compare to Omaha overall?
Was tract 31055007001 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Omaha
Top eight tracts in Omaha ranked by composite eviction-risk score.