NoDo Eviction Risk: Elevated , Omaha
Tract 31055001200 · Douglas County, NE · pop 4,256 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
Eviction risk in the NoDo neighborhood of Omaha centers on tract 31055001200, which scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 4,256 residents. That is riskier than about 68% of US census tracts.
About 61% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 38% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $969 monthly, set against $29,768 in average yearly household income, roughly 39% of income at the averages. About 55% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Omaha and the region
Centroid at 41.2782, -95.9422 · click any tract to drill in
Why NoDo scores 6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow NoDo compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 100
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 100%Socioeconomic
- 94%Household composition
- 83%Racial/ethnic minority
- 99%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 59%Grade C
- 41%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 871Total filings over 13 yrs
- 12.47%Avg annual filing rate
- 17.7%Peak (2008)
- 56Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within NoDo. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 32.6%Housing insecurity
- 27.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 48.1%Food insecurity
- 48.5%SNAP enrollment
- 23.7%Transit barriers
- 21.1%No health insurance
- 20.4%Frequent mental distress
- 44.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in NoDo
What moves this score most is economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Omaha eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Douglas County average of 4.8 and above the Nebraska statewide average of 3.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 100th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
In CDC survey modeling, about 32.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 27.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 31055001200
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31055001200?
What is the average rent in tract 31055001200?
What is the poverty rate in tract 31055001200?
How socially vulnerable is tract 31055001200?
Is tract 31055001200 considered part of NoDo?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31055001200?
What share of households in tract 31055001200 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 31055001200 compare to Omaha overall?
Was tract 31055001200 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Omaha
Top eight tracts in Omaha ranked by composite eviction-risk score.