Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally
NoDo Eviction Risk: Moderate , Omaha
Tract 31055001600 · Douglas County, NE · pop 3,424 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
31055001600 is a census tract in the NoDo area of Omaha, NE. It scores 5.1/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,424. Severe burden reaches 55%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 71%
Stable renters 28%
Owners 1%
Tract context
Occupied units861
Renter share99.1%
SVI overall0.38
Poverty rate55.2%
Median income$23,125
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
85
th percentile
High
Within county
83
th percentile
High
Within state
99
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Omaha and the region
Centroid at 41.2637, -95.9453 · click any tract to drill in
Why NoDo scores 5.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Omaha
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
55.2% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$1,234 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Omaha
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Omaha
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Omaha
3.0
How NoDo compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 38
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 76%Socioeconomic
- 0%Household composition
- 49%Racial/ethnic minority
- 65%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 38%Grade C
- 1%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 30Total filings over 9 yrs
- 1.42%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.2%Peak (2002)
- 3Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 79% over the past 13 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within NoDo. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 15.7%Housing insecurity
- 11.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 26.3%Food insecurity
- 20.2%SNAP enrollment
- 17.0%Transit barriers
- 12.0%No health insurance
- 25.0%Frequent mental distress
- 33.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in NoDo
Cost burden runs 72% here against 44.0% across Douglas County. Set annual rent against average income of $23,125 and the ratio lands at 64%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
The score leans hardest on economic stress at 10/10. The poverty rate is 55%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
This is renter territory: 99% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10.
Running cool, state political climate reads 1.8/10. It sits 1.2 points above the Douglas County average of 3.9.
Food insecurity runs 26.3% against 17.8% nationally. Court records carry 30 eviction filings across 9 observed years.
Filings peaked in 2002 at 3.2% of renter households. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Omaha. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 1.4% of renter households face a filing.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 31055001600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31055001600?
Census tract 31055001600 in the NoDo neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 31055001600?
Median gross rent is $1,234/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 72% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 31055001600?
55.2% of residents in tract 31055001600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,424.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 31055001600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 38th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 76th, household 0th, minority 49th, housing 65th.
Q5
Is tract 31055001600 considered part of NoDo?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 31055001600 fall within NoDo (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31055001600?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 30 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 31055001600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.42% of renter households, peaking at 3.2% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 31055001600 struggle to pay rent?
About 15.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 31055001600 compare to Omaha overall?
Tract 31055001600 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Omaha at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Omaha eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 31055001600 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Omaha
Top eight tracts in Omaha ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · NE
Beechwood
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
South Omaha
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Blackstone
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
31055005901
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Beechwood
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Blackstone
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
31055005902
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
East Omaha
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Related