Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally

The Old Market Eviction Risk: Moderate , Omaha

Tract 31055003300 · Douglas County, NE · pop 2,002 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Census tract 31055003300 covers part of the The Old Market area of Omaha, NE, and scores 5.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,002. Food insecurity runs 39.9% against 17.8% nationally.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 28% Owners 58%
Tract context
Occupied units613
Renter share41.4%
SVI overall0.90
Poverty rate31.3%
Median income$41,042

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 7 tracts In The Old Market
Low
Within parent city
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#38 of 157 tracts In Omaha
High
Within county
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 163 tracts In Douglas County
Very High
Within state
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 553 tracts In Nebraska
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Omaha and the region

Centroid at 41.2413, -95.9495 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Old Market scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Omaha
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
31.3% poverty · this tract
7.8
Supply constraint
$975 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Omaha
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Omaha
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Omaha
3.0

How The Old Market compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Old Market risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.1This tracttract 0033003.7Omahaparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county3.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 90

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 362Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 9.88%Avg annual filing rate
  • 14.8%Peak (2002)
  • 26Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 31055003300
Filings dropped 40% over the past 13 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within The Old Market. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Old Market

Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. The severe-burden share is 26%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Cost burden runs 33% here against 44.0% across Douglas County. The poverty rate is 31%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.8/10.

Running hot, economic stress reads 7.8/10. It sits 1.2 points above the Douglas County average of 3.9. Average gross rent is $975, 18% below the Omaha average.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 18.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. The filing record is not thin: 362 evictions over 13 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2002 at 14.8% of renter households.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 31055003300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31055003300?

Census tract 31055003300 in the The Old Market neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 31055003300?

Median gross rent is $975/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 31055003300?

31.3% of residents in tract 31055003300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,002.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 31055003300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 94th, household 89th, minority 80th, housing 60th.
Q5

Is tract 31055003300 considered part of The Old Market?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 31055003300 fall within The Old Market (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31055003300?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 362 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 31055003300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.88% of renter households, peaking at 14.8% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 31055003300 struggle to pay rent?

About 28.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 18.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 31055003300 compare to Omaha overall?

Tract 31055003300 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Omaha at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Omaha eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 31055003300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 22% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Omaha

Top eight tracts in Omaha ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related